22
votes
Is error correction necessary?
That doesn't scale well. After a moderately long calculation you're basically left with the maximally mixed state or whatever fixed point your noise has. To scale to arbitrary long calculations you ...
15
votes
Accepted
How good is basic_device_noise_model() simulating the noise in the quantum computer?
There is no specific paper for this, though information on the model can be found in the Qiskit Aer API documentation and is based on the research of IBMQ quantum computing group. As examples you can ...
14
votes
Is error correction necessary?
If the error rate were low enough, you could run a computation a hundred times and take the most common answer. For instance, this would work if the error rate were low enough that the expected number ...
14
votes
Accepted
What exactly is meant by "noise" in the following context?
As an addition to Nat's answer, it's worth mentioning that 'noise' is a specific concept1 in quantum computing. This answer will use Preskill's lecture notes as a basis.
In essence, noise is indeed ...
11
votes
What exactly is meant by "noise" in the following context?
Unfortunately for analog computation it turns out that when realistic assumptions about the presence of noise in analog computers are made, their power disappears in all known instances; they cannot ...
10
votes
Accepted
How does approximating gates via universal gates scale with the length of the computation?
Throughout this answer, the norm of a matrix $A$, $\left\lVert A\right\rVert$ will be taken to be the spectral norm of $A$ (that is, the largest singular value of $A$). The solovay-Kitaev theorem ...
10
votes
Which quantum error correction code has the highest threshold (as proven at the time of writing this)?
As far as I’m aware, the surface code is still regarded as the best. With an assumption of all elements failing with equal probability (and doing so in a certain way) it has a threshold of around 1%.
...
9
votes
Accepted
Degradable channels and their quantum capacity
A channel $\Phi$ is said to be degradable if there exists another channel $\Xi$ such that $\Xi\Phi$ is complementary to $\Phi$.
The idea here is as follows. Suppose $\Phi$ is a channel and $\Psi$ is ...
8
votes
Accepted
How to selectively apply noise in Qiskit simulations?
Yes you can: When you build a noise model the noise is defined with respect to the name or label of gate objects, so you can use the labelto create multiple versions of a single gate but reference ...
7
votes
How can noise on a device be simulated using measured noise parameters?
This can be done using the 'Aer' component of Qiskit. The properties information can be turned into a noise model using
...
7
votes
Which quantum error correction code has the highest threshold (as proven at the time of writing this)?
I believe that the Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems, School of Physics, The University of Sydney and the Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology use of a tensor ...
7
votes
Accepted
How do quantum computers prevent "quantum noise"?
How do we prevent quantum noise in a quantum computer?
Well, technically the answer is (at least for most systems): we use ridiculously low temperatures (much colder than space), we shield everything ...
7
votes
Depolarizing channel implementation on IBM Q
There are several ways that you could realise the depolarising map $
\mathcal N_p(\rho) = (1\!-\!p)\:\!\rho + p \!\!\:\cdot\!\tfrac{1}{2}\mathbf 1$ map on a quantum computer — including an ...
7
votes
Accepted
Incorporating idling errors while using stim
No, there's no simple built-in way. You have to do it for yourself. This was an intentional design choice, which I will now attempt to justify because I do realize it's inconvenient.
Stim has no ...
6
votes
Accepted
What kind of errors does the master equation in the Lindblad form describe, continuous errors or discrete errors?
The errors that are described by the Master equation are continuous errors. The action of error correction is to discretize those errors.
For example, dephasing noise can be described by the Master ...
6
votes
Accepted
IBM Q calibration parameters
frequency (GHz): The frequency(energy) associated with the transition between the qubit's ground state ($|0\rangle$) and first excited state ($|1\rangle$).
readout error: The probability of preparing ...
6
votes
Accepted
Why attenuator and not filters for QC driving line
(1) Both filters and attenuators are used
Let me just start by saying that non-attenuating filters have not been completely ruled out by people working in the design of cold quantum computers. I will ...
5
votes
Accepted
Is it true that observing a quantum state will end the superposition of states? How can I not observe?
I'm going to go for an intuitive answer here, as requested. Let's s go in steps:
Your input is (often?) classical, so up to that point we're good.
Then you start doing quantum operations and achieve, ...
5
votes
Accepted
Exponential Growth of Noise in Quantum Computers
According to so-called threshold theorem, it is possible to get rid of errors in quantum computation with arbitrary precision. However, there is an assumption that you have enough qubits.
To ...
5
votes
How to not optimize the quantum gates in a qiskit circuit when running it in the real device?
Optimization level 0 does not perform 1 qubit gate optimization and it will send 2 X gates (well 2 U3 gates after it unrolls to the basis set). You can see the passes optimization level 0 runs here: ...
5
votes
Accepted
Why should we use density matrices to simulate quantum systems with noise?
Noise effects introduce classical uncertainty in what the underlying state is. A mixed state is a statistical ensemble of several quantum states $|\psi_i\rangle$ (not necessarily orthogonal), with ...
5
votes
Is spontaneous excitation possible?
As a first note: the (uncontrolled) transition of $|1\rangle$ to $|0\rangle$ is generally not referred to as dephasing but as relaxation. The noise-process that involves (spontaneous) relaxation is ...
5
votes
Accepted
How can I fit an unknown quantum channel?
The 2-norm difference typically isn't particularly physical. So no, this is most likely not the right distance. What you want from a physical point of view is a distance measure which measures the ...
5
votes
Accepted
Can quantum error correction work on any type of channel?
For any quantum error correcting code, it is possible to construct a channel which introduces errors that the code cannot correct. However, the key point is that such channels are highly adversarial ...
5
votes
How are eavesdroppers detected when using BB84 in the presence of noise?
The standard noisy approach is not to try to determine the presence of an eavesdropper as such, but to create a final key where, even if there is an eavesdropper, you can still be confident that the ...
5
votes
Accepted
Is it possible to use fake backends to run Qiskit Runtime primitives?
Using primitives with fake backends
You can use BackendEstimator to work with fake backends. As primitives implementation, ...
5
votes
Accepted
What is the clear definition of coherent versus incoherent errors?
Coherent vs incoherent: as a rule of thumb, coherent is unitary, incoherent is stochastic. The distinction is not entirely clear when your channel is a mixture of these. Thus, it makes sense to ...
4
votes
Is error correction necessary?
noise should average itself out.
Noise doesn't perfectly average itself out. That's the Gambler's Fallacy. Even though noise tends to meander back and forth, it still accumulates over time.
For ...
4
votes
Accepted
How are Rigetti and IBM QX device parameters related to Kraus operators?
For amplitude damping, $\gamma$ is something like $e^{-\Delta t/T_1}$ where $\Delta t$ is how long the Kraus operator is supposed to act. But be very careful, Kraus evolution assumes your system has ...
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
Related Tags
noise × 201qiskit × 69
quantum-operation × 34
error-correction × 31
programming × 27
simulation × 21
quantum-gate × 19
ibm-q-experience × 19
measurement × 17
quantum-state × 16
error-mitigation × 14
decoherence × 12
experimental-realization × 12
kraus-representation × 9
depolarizing-channel × 9
stabilizer-code × 8
fidelity × 8
stim × 8
ibm-quantum-devices × 8
quantum-circuit × 7
density-matrix × 6
quantum-algorithms × 6
entanglement × 5
nielsen-and-chuang × 5
information-theory × 5