2
$\begingroup$

Peng et. al. Describe a circuit for entanglement cloning (i.e. entanglement broadcasting) which on its own looks fairly straightforward:

Figure 1 from Peng

Confusingly however, the gates $U_1$ and $U_2$ are not logical gates per sey. Rather, they act on the creation operators for their respective modes. In the supplimentary material for the paper, U is defined in the following way:

enter image description here

Apparently, Peng has a way to find the resulting state post-selected on the condition that all modes have exactly one photon:

enter image description here

Obviously I'm not asking anyone to do the math and show why this is true. What I am asking is how one would go about doing this? I've never seen a quantum circuit that has these kinds of "gates" thrown in like this before. Is there any way to systematically unpack this circuit into something that qiskit would be able to handle?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Working in the many-boson formalism is not that different than the more standard "gate-based" approach you might be more used to. The main difference is that the unitary operations technically act on infinite-dimensional spaces, because each mode can accomodate an arbitrary number of bosons.

However, as long as you stick with linear operations, meaning in this context operations that preserve the total number of bosons, things can be again represented as just matrices applied to vectors. So, for example, the $U_i$ operations you seem to be defining here can be understood as just standard beamsplitter operations with elements $$\begin{pmatrix}\sqrt{1-R} & i\sqrt R \\ i\sqrt R & \sqrt{1-R}\end{pmatrix},$$ wrt the appropriate basis. Of course, the major catch is that this is only true when these operations are applied to input single bosons. The moment you inject, say, one boson in each input mode of the operation, this naive matrix description fails, and you get e.g. HOM-like effects.

You can still describe each operation in a linear optical context as a matrix in the above sense, even when more bosons are used, but you'll have to be more careful about the associated matrix representation. For example, the action of an $n$-mode unitary $U$ acting on $k$-boson input states will correspond to a matrix $\varphi_k(U)$ of dimension $\binom{n+k-1}{k}$, whose elements correspond, modulo factors, to permanents of $k\times k$ submatrices of the "standard" matrix representation of $U$. Though explaining how this works precisely might be a bit OT here.

Alternatively, you can of course just use the formalism with creation/annihilation operators to carry out the calculations. To find the "post-selected states" you then just need to find the coefficients of the terms containing the correct numbers of creation operators in the modes you want them to be in.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Helpful answer, thanks. I recall hearing something similar WRT Boson Sampling. I agree a full explanation here would be off topic, but would that be a good place to go looking? Still not 100% sure how to derive these submatrices. $\endgroup$
    – Visipi
    Mar 7 at 22:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.