3
$\begingroup$

Say I have a quantum register consisting of two qubits like this $\left| -,0\right>$ which as a vector would be $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(1, 0, -1, 0)$. If I only started with this vector, would it possible using only the vector formulation to find the two qubits that make it up ie. $\left|-\right> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(1, -1)$ and $\left|0\right> = (1, 0)$? How would that be done in a general case where we only have a vector $(v_{1},v_{2}, ....v_{n})$ and we know it consists of $log_{2}(n)$ qubits?

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Here's a simple method that will work on any state that is not entangled with other qubits. It's also pretty efficient; it's the method used by the amplitude displays in Quirk.

  1. Find the index $k$ of any one of the largest magnitude entries in the vector. In your case this would be index 0 or index 2. Technically any non-zero entry will do, but if you aren't being perfectly precise then picking the largest will reduce numerical error.

  2. Split $k$ into the "included in my subsystem" part and the "excluded from my subsystem" part. For example the index $k=2$ splits into the index pair $(k_i, k_e) = (1, 0)$ whereas the index 0 would split into (0, 0).

  3. Let $w_{r}$ be the vector formed by holding $k_i=r$ fixed while you vary $k_e$ over all possible exterior values and tale the corresponding amplitude in the state vector. For example, you hold the 1 in (1, 0) constant while iterating the other. So you need to look up (1, 0) which is $-1$ and (1, 1) which is $0$. So $w_{k_i}$ would be $(-1, 0)$.

  4. Let $v = w_{k_i} / |w_{k_i}|$ be the renormalized vector. This is the state vector of the subsystem, up to global phase. Note that in our case it equals $-|0\rangle$, which is in fact one of the qubit states (up to global phase).

  5. [Optional] Verify. If $v$ is actually the subsystem vector, then all $w_r$ should be parallel to $v$. You can check this by checking that $|\sum_r \langle v | w_r\rangle | = 1$. If it's not, the internal and external states are entangled.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.