6
$\begingroup$

Qubits have 3 states: 1, 0, and 1 and 0 at the same time. If a qubit can have 3 states, then how come they are seen as different from ternary computing, which also has 3 states?

Is it that the 3 states are represented in different ways, or what?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

16
$\begingroup$

Qubits have more than three distinct states. Here are six examples of such states:

\begin{align} |0\rangle\tag{1}\\ |1\rangle\tag{2}\\ |+\rangle = \frac{|0\rangle + |1\rangle}{\sqrt{2}}\tag{3} \\ |-\rangle = \frac{|0\rangle - |1\rangle}{\sqrt{2}} \tag{4}\\ |{+i}\rangle = \frac{|0\rangle +i |1\rangle}{\sqrt{2}} \tag{5}\\ |{-i}\rangle = \frac{|0\rangle -i |1\rangle}{\sqrt{2}}\tag{6}. \end{align}

In fact, a qubit has an infinite number of distinct states. For every $\theta \in [0, \pi)$ and $\phi \in [0, 2\pi)$

$$\tag{7} \cos\frac{\theta}{2} |0\rangle + e^{i\phi}\sin\frac{\theta}{2} |1\rangle $$

is a distinct pure state of a qubit.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ More generally, in an $n$-qudit Hilbert space (= a Hilbert space with $n$ basis states), one can attach a coefficient $c_k \in \mathbb{C}$ to each of the basis states, leading to "as many different states" as $\mathbb{C}^n \cong \mathbb{R}^{2n}$ has, but one degree of freedom (DOF) is removed due to normalization of the state and one is removed since QM is invariant under global phase changes, i.e., one has $2n-2$ DOF, (or "infinity to the $2n-2$ different states", figuratively). $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 27, 2021 at 17:58
  • $\begingroup$ OP might be wondering what the notation you are using means. To answer this question in layman terms: when a qubit is said to be "1 and 0 at the same time" what it means is that, it is in a probabilistic state. With some probability P, it is a 1, and with probability 1-P, it is 0. Additionally, qubits are also in a specific 'phase' which is analogous to phases in sin and cosin functions. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 15, 2021 at 22:59
5
$\begingroup$

Simple answer: no.

Qubits are the same as regular bits in almost every way; except two fundamental differences, superposition and entanglement (I will only address superposition since it is the focus of your question). Qubits can only be observed in $| 0 \rangle$ or $| 1 \rangle$, something you have probably heard as 'wave function collapse', but the basic idea is that when we observe qubits, they carry the same information as regular bits. Which begs the question; what is superposition?

The way quantum mechanics works generally, is that there are certain states we can observe for a given system; whether that be energy, spin, angular momentum, etc. And observations do not commute, this means that our state in fact cannot be described as existing in a single state, rather it must be a in a 'distribution' of states; or better said a 'superposition' of states.

There are many nuances and subtleties as to how these probabilities come up, and why they are represented by complex numbers, but the basic idea is as follows; a Qubit $| x \rangle$ is written as :

$$| x \rangle = \alpha| 0 \rangle + \beta| 1 \rangle$$

We have a probability $|\alpha|^2$ of finding it in $|0 \rangle$ and probability $|\beta|^2$ of finding it in $|1 \rangle$, we can never actually measure it "in between 0 and 1". Notice also that superposition is a fundamental aspect of quantum physics, which is nature. It is how nature works as hard as that may be to understand, and we use our engineering and computer-science techniques to take advantage of this superposition for the implementation of various algorithms.

Since your question was about why qubits are not ternary this would be a good place to stop, but you might at this point be wondering, that just seems like a more complicated way to do normal computing... in part you would be correct. However, the idea of superposition and entanglement opens a new Pandora's box of computational methods, and allows us to approach some problems in different ways, which is what makes quantum computers so cool!

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.