5
$\begingroup$

I recently had an assignment where the question is based on the assumption that we can write any pure state qubit $|\phi \rangle$ as: $$|\phi \rangle = \gamma |\psi\rangle + \delta |\psi^\perp \rangle$$ Where $|\psi\rangle$ and $|\psi^\perp \rangle$ are 2 antipodal points on the Bloch sphere: $$ |\psi\rangle = \cos \frac{\theta}{2} |0\rangle +e^{i\varphi}\sin \frac{\theta}{2} |1\rangle$$ $$ |\psi^\perp\rangle = \cos \frac{\theta + \pi}{2} |0\rangle +e^{i\varphi}\sin \frac{\theta + \pi}{2} |1\rangle$$

I have a lingering question about how this actually works. So far I got: $$|\phi\rangle= \gamma |\psi\rangle + \delta |\psi^{\perp}\rangle$$ $$= \gamma \left(\cos \frac{\theta}{2} |0\rangle +e^{i\varphi}\sin \frac{\theta}{2} |1\rangle \right) + \delta \left(\cos \frac{\theta + \pi}{2} |0\rangle +e^{i\varphi}\sin \frac{\theta + \pi}{2} |1\rangle \right)$$ $$ = \left(\gamma \cos \frac{\theta}{2} + \delta \cos \frac{\theta + \pi}{2}\right)|0\rangle + \left(\gamma e^{i\varphi}\sin \frac{\theta}{2} + \delta e^{i\varphi} \sin \frac{\theta + \pi}{2}\right)|1\rangle$$ $$\Rightarrow \alpha = \gamma \cos \frac{\theta}{2} + \delta \cos \frac{\theta + \pi}{2}$$ $$\Rightarrow \beta = \gamma e^{i\varphi}\sin \frac{\theta}{2} + \delta e^{i\varphi} \sin \frac{\theta + \pi}{2}$$ So $\alpha^2 + \beta^2 = 1$. I'm not sure if I can solve this equation. I wonder if it's solvable or is there a better way to go about understanding writing a pure state in $|\psi\rangle$ and $|\psi^\perp \rangle$ basis. I know that they are orthonormal so intuitively it should work.

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ I think $\varphi$ in the $|\psi^\perp\rangle$ definition should be with "$-$" sign, am I right? The main question/problem is about how to prove $\alpha^2 + \beta^2 = 1$? Or is it about finding $\gamma$ and $\delta$ for given $\alpha$ and $ \beta$? $\endgroup$ Apr 6, 2020 at 20:48
  • $\begingroup$ @DavitKhachatryan hm why should it be $-\varphi$? I thought it's only negative when you take the complex conjugate i.e. $\langle \psi^\perp|$. And yes, the question is to prove that. I could have been clearer about it. $\endgroup$
    – Cat Mai
    Apr 6, 2020 at 20:58
  • $\begingroup$ @DavitKhachatryan I guess once I prove $\alpha^2 + \beta^2 = 1$ then it's should be easy to find $\gamma$ and $\delta$. $\endgroup$
    – Cat Mai
    Apr 6, 2020 at 21:00
  • $\begingroup$ But antipodal points don't have the same $\varphi$ in the Bloch sphere (here I am thinking just geometrically). $\endgroup$ Apr 6, 2020 at 21:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Wouldn't it be $\langle \psi^\perp| = \cos \frac{\theta + \pi}{2} \langle 0| -e^{i\varphi}\sin \frac{\theta + \pi}{2} \langle 1|$? Then when you take $\langle\psi^\perp | \psi\rangle = 0$ $\endgroup$
    – Cat Mai
    Apr 6, 2020 at 21:11

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Two antipodal states in the Bloch sphere (note that $0 \leq \theta \leq \pi$):

\begin{equation} |\psi \rangle = \cos \frac{\theta}{2} |0 \rangle + e^{i\varphi}\sin \frac{\theta}{2} |1 \rangle \\ |\psi^\perp \rangle = \cos \frac{\pi - \theta}{2} |0 \rangle + e^{i\varphi + \pi}\sin \frac{\pi - \theta}{2} |1 \rangle = \sin \frac{\theta}{2} |0 \rangle - e^{i\varphi}\cos \frac{\theta}{2} |1 \rangle \end{equation}

The expression for $|\psi^\perp \rangle$ from the question is different from this $|\psi^\perp \rangle$ by a global phase. The reason why I prefer this notation is that I want to keep Bloch sphere formalism (e.g. $0 \leq (\pi - \theta) \leq \pi$ constrant that is true for $|\psi^\perp \rangle$ presented here). Note that:

$$\langle \psi | \psi^\perp \rangle = \cos \frac{\theta}{2} \sin \frac{\theta}{2} - \sin \frac{\theta}{2} \cos \frac{\theta}{2} = 0$$

By doing the same calculations we can obtain for $|\phi\rangle= \gamma |\psi\rangle + \delta |\psi^{\perp}\rangle = \alpha |0\rangle + \beta |1\rangle$:

\begin{align*} &\alpha = \gamma \cos \frac{\theta}{2} + \delta \sin \frac{\theta}{2} \\ &\beta = \gamma e^{i\varphi}\sin \frac{\theta}{2} - \delta e^{i\varphi} \cos \frac{\theta}{2} \end{align*}

Then (here I take into account that $|e^{i\varphi}| = 1$):

\begin{equation} |\alpha|^2 = |\gamma|^2 \cos^2 \frac{\theta}{2} + |\delta|^2 \sin^2 \frac{\theta}{2} + 2 Re(\gamma) Re(\delta) \cos \frac{\theta}{2}\sin \frac{\theta}{2} + 2 Im(\gamma) Im(\delta) \cos \frac{\theta}{2}\sin \frac{\theta}{2} \end{equation}

\begin{equation} |\beta|^2 = |\gamma|^2 \sin^2 \frac{\theta}{2} + |\delta|^2 \cos^2 \frac{\theta}{2} - 2Re(\gamma) Re(\delta)\cos \frac{\theta}{2} \sin \frac{\theta}{2} - 2Im(\gamma) Im(\delta)\cos \frac{\theta}{2} \sin \frac{\theta}{2} \end{equation}

Because if we have two complex numbers $z_1 = x_1 + i y_1$ and $z_2 = x_2 + i y_2$, then:

$$|z_1 \pm z_2|^2 = (x_1 \pm x_2)^2 + (y_1 \pm y_2)^2 = |z_1|^2 + |z_2|^2 \pm 2 x_1 x_2 \pm 2 y_1 y_2$$

After summing the expressions for $|\alpha|^2$ and $|\beta|^2$ we will obtain:

$$|\alpha|^2 + |\beta|^2 = \left(|\gamma|^2 + |\delta|^2 \right) \left(\sin^2 \frac{\theta}{2} + \cos^2 \frac{\theta}{2} \right) =1$$

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I don't really follow the calculation. Why is there 2 terms of $Im$? I think the first $Re$ term is from $|\alpha^2|$ and the other one is from $|\beta^2|$. But I don't get where the 2 $Im$ terms come from. Also, for 2 complex number, did you do the calculation directly instead of expanding $e^{i\varphi} = \cos\varphi + i\sin\varphi$? $\endgroup$
    – Cat Mai
    Apr 7, 2020 at 14:35
  • $\begingroup$ @CatMai $2 Re(\gamma)Re(\delta)... + 2Im(\gamma)Im(\delta)...$ is coming from $|\alpha|^2$. $ - 2 Re(\gamma)Re(\delta)... - 2Im(\gamma)Im(\delta)...$ is coming from $|\beta|^2$. $\endgroup$ Apr 7, 2020 at 14:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For example, for $\alpha$: $z_1 = \gamma \cos(\theta/2)$, $z_2 = \delta \sin(\theta/2)$ , $x_1 = Re(\gamma cos(\theta/2))$, $x_2 = Re(\delta \sin(\theta/2)$ , $y_1 = Im(\gamma cos(\theta/2))$ and $y_2 = Im(\delta \sin(\theta/2)$. $\endgroup$ Apr 7, 2020 at 14:49
  • $\begingroup$ For $|\beta|^2 = |e^{i\varphi}|^2|\gamma \sin(\theta/2)- \delta \cos(\theta/2)|^2 $ and $|e^{i\varphi}|^2 = 1$. So we shouldn't worry about $\varphi$. $\endgroup$ Apr 7, 2020 at 14:53
  • $\begingroup$ @CatMai I edited my answer in order to show the calculations of $|\alpha|^2$ and $|\beta|^2$ separately. $\endgroup$ Apr 7, 2020 at 15:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.