Timeline for Can we use entanglement for cascaded measurements
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2023 at 15:15 | vote | accept | yousef elbrolosy | ||
| S Oct 2, 2023 at 18:22 | history | suggested | FDGod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
latex, grammar
|
| Oct 2, 2023 at 17:10 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 2, 2023 at 18:22 | |||||
| Oct 2, 2023 at 14:06 | answer | added | Mark Spinelli | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 1, 2023 at 0:28 | comment | added | Mark Spinelli | Then the other two first qubits are also entangled with the last two qubits. You have a state such as $1/\sqrt 2(|00000\rangle + |11111\rangle)$. | |
| Oct 1, 2023 at 0:20 | comment | added | yousef elbrolosy | I have 5 qubits three of them are in a ghz state and one of those three is in a ghz state with 2 other qubits, therefore 5 qubits | |
| Oct 1, 2023 at 0:02 | comment | added | Mark Spinelli | How many qubits do you have? The GHZ state is conventionally only 3. Your third sentence sounds like you are violating the monogamy of entanglement, while your fourth sentence sounds like your state is something like $\frac {1}{\sqrt 2}(|00000\rangle + |111110\rangle)$. | |
| Sep 30, 2023 at 23:50 | history | asked | yousef elbrolosy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |