Timeline for Is the "Quantum Volume" a fair metric for future, elaborate, high value quantum computations?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2018 at 6:30 | comment | added | Alan Geller | Agreed; both in algorithms, and in T distillation, and in QEC. As I said, the estimates in the nitrogenase paper are high -- but the tables are nice and clear :-), and it's focused on one problem and so (perhaps) easier to follow. | |
| Aug 10, 2018 at 5:16 | comment | added | Craig Gidney | There's been significant progress in the past few years on top of the paper you've linked. arxiv.org/abs/1805.03662 gives estimates that are tens of millions times better. | |
| S Aug 9, 2018 at 17:24 | history | suggested | Chris Granade | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Applied TeX formatting.
|
| Aug 9, 2018 at 17:23 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 9, 2018 at 17:24 | |||||
| Aug 9, 2018 at 16:55 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 9, 2018 at 19:55 | |||||
| Aug 9, 2018 at 16:53 | history | answered | Alan Geller | CC BY-SA 4.0 |