Timeline for What is the meaning of "error threshold" in quantum error correction?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20 at 18:43 | history | edited | Peter-Jan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Feb 19 at 10:49 | comment | added | Peter-Jan | Yes, most common is a depolarising model with weight one paulis after single qubit gates and weight two paulis after two qubit gates. In Appendix A [Benchmarking the Honeycomb Code]( quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2022-09-21-813/pdf) a clear description of this most common error model is given. | |
| Feb 16 at 16:40 | vote | accept | Eric Kubischta | ||
| Feb 16 at 16:25 | comment | added | Eric Kubischta | Ok great answer, this is sort of what I was anticipating but your answer makes it much more clear. Could you maybe explain more about how one "takes an error sample from the error model"? Are most people assuming a certain error model (like a depolarizing model where all non-trivial errors have the same probability) or what is most common? | |
| Feb 16 at 12:37 | history | edited | Peter-Jan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 778 characters in body
|
| Feb 16 at 12:31 | history | answered | Peter-Jan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |