Timeline for Qiskit: Sum of Kraus operators are not equal to identity matrix
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14 at 23:00 | vote | accept | quest | ||
| S Apr 13 at 1:08 | history | edited | FDGod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
replaced image by latex
|
| S Apr 13 at 1:08 | history | suggested | Frederik vom Ende | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
replaced image by latex
|
| Apr 12 at 7:12 | answer | added | Frederik vom Ende | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 12 at 6:51 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 13 at 1:08 | |||||
| Feb 15, 2022 at 11:44 | comment | added | quest | @luciano I am not so sure for my solution. That is why I need to wait 2 more days and if noone answers, I will add a comment regarding what I found and then I will close the topic | |
| Feb 15, 2022 at 9:56 | comment | added | luciano | @quest do you mind sharing the solution or close the question? | |
| Feb 15, 2022 at 7:56 | history | edited | glS♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 15, 2022 at 3:46 | history | edited | quest | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Feb 14, 2022 at 23:10 | comment | added | quest |
thanks for the comment, you are right but id did not affect my result. I first tried what you suggested and then I inverse the equation just to see if something changes and then I pasted here the last version, As a result even if I write: np.matmul(kraus_list[0].conj().T, kraus_list[0]) nothing changes. BUt I guess I found the problem
|
|
| Feb 14, 2022 at 14:30 | comment | added | Yael Ben-Haim |
I haven't gone through all the details, but I suspect that it's supposed to be np.matmul(kraus_list[0].conj().T, kraus_list[0]) (see that formula that you pasted)
|
|
| Feb 14, 2022 at 14:04 | history | asked | quest | CC BY-SA 4.0 |