Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 10, 2021 at 15:43 vote accept vivek kumar
Jul 5, 2021 at 21:21 history edited Adam Zalcman CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 41 characters in body; edited tags
Jul 5, 2021 at 21:19 answer added Adam Zalcman timeline score: 2
Jul 5, 2021 at 16:10 comment added Condo It's kind of easy to what happens if you take @DaftWullie's advice and believe the combinatorial formula $\prod_{v\in V}(1+x_v)=\sum_{S\subseteq V}\prod_{v\in S}x_v$, where $\{x_v\}_{v\in V}$ are a finite set of indeterminates.
Jul 5, 2021 at 7:01 comment added DaftWullie Try expressing $y$ in terms of binary.
Jul 4, 2021 at 20:54 history edited glS CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title; edited tags
Jul 4, 2021 at 19:08 comment added keisuke.akira Any state of the form $| a_{1} \rangle \otimes | a_{2} \rangle \otimes \cdots | a_{n} \rangle$ is unentangled. In your question if $| \phi \rangle$ is of the form $\otimes_{i=1}^{n} \left( | 0 \rangle + \alpha_{i} | 0 \rangle \right)$ then, by definition, it is unentangled.
Jul 4, 2021 at 11:49 comment added Harshit Gupta I think this is very similar to the Quantum Fourier Transform of a state. If you refer to the Circuit Implementation heading of this wiki article you would be able to find your answer. Also, I think there needs to be an overall amplitude factor of $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2^{n}}}$ multiplied with the state $|\phi \rangle$ to make it normalized.
Jul 4, 2021 at 5:49 history asked vivek kumar CC BY-SA 4.0