Timeline for Is $e^{i\beta} R_Z(-2\beta)$ equivalent to $U_1(2\beta)$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 11:19 | vote | accept | John | ||
| Jun 11, 2020 at 9:34 | comment | added | Martin Vesely | This can help: quantumcomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/11888/… | |
| Jun 11, 2020 at 6:14 | comment | added | Davit Khachatryan | From the notation used in this question $R_z(\theta) = \begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 \\ 0&e^{i \theta} \end{pmatrix}$. Although I am not sure about the "conventionality"/widespread of this notation, but If we use this definition for $R_z$ instead of the definition used in the textbook (shown in my answer) then $R_z(\theta) = U_1(\theta)$ without any global phase difference. | |
| Jun 10, 2020 at 23:10 | history | edited | John | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 279 characters in body
|
| Jun 10, 2020 at 22:18 | vote | accept | John | ||
| Jun 10, 2020 at 22:56 | |||||
| Jun 10, 2020 at 15:35 | history | edited | glS♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 40 characters in body; edited title
|
| Jun 10, 2020 at 13:03 | answer | added | Davit Khachatryan | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 10, 2020 at 12:39 | history | asked | John | CC BY-SA 4.0 |