Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with quantum-advantage
Search options not deleted
user 18494
For questions about schemes to prove that quantum devices can, at least in principle, be exponentially more efficient than their classical ones. Also often referred to as "quantum computational advantage" or "quantum supremacy". Typical examples are sampling problems such as boson sampling and random circuit sampling.
1
vote
1
answer
243
views
How does a quantum computer execute a process by leveraging superposition?
I understand in plain terms superposition and entanglement, but I'm very unclear how either of these could work as a means to increase computation power.
A helpful metaphor is that of the maze. A norm …
- 111