Questions tagged [ibm]
For questions about IBM's quantum computing processors and devices. For their cloud-computing service use the [ibm-q-experience] tag instead.
22
questions
0
votes
2answers
96 views
'IBMQFactory' object has no attribute 'load_accounts'
I am following this qiskit workshop from https://colab.research.google.com/github/mtreinish/qiskit-workshop/blob/master/Workshop.ipynb . After adding my API key I had encountered the error ...
1
vote
0answers
40 views
Grover's algorithm for 3SAT problem gives erroneous results
I'm writing a code in python with qiskit that implements Grover's algorithm to solve the 3-SAT problem, but when I run it it doesn't give the correct annswer. I've checked the circuit with the ...
3
votes
2answers
98 views
Why IBM devices have the same number of qubit and the same architecture, but the error rates are different?
Here are two different IBM quantum online devices,
Both of them have the 5 qubits and the same architectures.
But why do they have different error rate?
What's the different between them?
2
votes
1answer
110 views
How to plot histogram or Bloch sphere for multiple circuits?
I have tried to plot a histogram for the multiple circuits for the code given below. I think I have done it correctly but don't know why it's not working. Please help me out. If possible please solve ...
1
vote
1answer
93 views
Why qiskit superconducting device native gates different from that of trapped ion device?
For IBMQ device based on superconducting technology, when we transpile the circuit, it is decomposed of U1,U2,U3 and CNOT gates, which are its native gates.
However for trapped ion device, its native ...
6
votes
1answer
242 views
Why does Google's quantum processor outperform IBM's?
I understand that both have 53 qubit devices, yet it is Google that has demonstrated quantum supremacy (although IBM refutes this!). I'm not sure if this is true but it seems like IBM cannot replicate ...
11
votes
3answers
384 views
Why do the IBM and Google processors both have 53 qubits?
As I understand from this IBM post both the IBM and Google teams have independently built 53-qubit processors. What is the significance of the number 53? It is purely coincidental, or is there a ...
2
votes
1answer
75 views
Can we simulate quantum many-body systems with IBMQ Experience?
Consider physical systems such as electrons in metals, or Bose-Einstein condensates, or any crystal, which are realised in the real three-dimensional space.
If we want to simulate these systems on a ...
0
votes
1answer
188 views
Problem with initial_layout on Qiskit/IBMQ: 'Not enough qubits in CouplingGraph'
I am trying to run an execution on IBMQx2 where I can specify the physical qubits to which I apply gates. The execution without the initial_layout runs fine, but ...
1
vote
0answers
147 views
Comparing CPU to QPU In terms of processing power
The current processors are limited by the speed of the electrons but quantum processors take advantage of the properties of subatomic particles. But the question is how to compare the processing power ...
2
votes
1answer
163 views
IBM Slack links broken
Does anyone know where I can find working Slack invite links to any of IBM's Slack pages? The Slack links on this support page are all broken. Thank you.
3
votes
0answers
81 views
IBM Q devices' hardware/resource constraints
I tried to look for the resource constraints but so far haven't been able to find them. They are not present in the GitHub repository that usually provides the hardware information for the different ...
3
votes
1answer
479 views
IBM's quantum computing capabilities — entangled 18-qubit GHZ states and high coherence times
Here's a blog post that corresponds with what IBM presented at the 2019 March Meeting.
In this post, they claim they've measured qubit T1 relaxation times above 500 microseconds, and claim that they'...
1
vote
0answers
39 views
What is the difference in computational power between qubit and bit (transistor)? [duplicate]
If I use for example 5-qubit IBM-Q quantum computer and we accept the law of quantum parallelism ($n$ qubit = $2^n$ ordinary bits), so does it mean that computational power of this computer is equal ...
2
votes
2answers
191 views
Experiment runtime on IBMQ
I have been trying to get the runtime of my experiment on IBM's quantum computer. I am using the classic stuff, i.e
...
5
votes
0answers
80 views
Graphing the decoherence of qubits being used to perform an algorithm
How would I be able to graph the decoherence of qubits being used to perform an algorithm? I'm working with the IBMQ Qiskit framework and I'm trying to write a program that allows me to find the ...
2
votes
1answer
68 views
How many physical qubits are used when I run a program on a IBM Q computer?
How do I find out how many physical-qubits I'm using when I run my program in an IBM Q backend quantum computing system?
3
votes
2answers
335 views
What is maximum circuit depth and size IBM Q5 and Q16 could handle?
I'm trying to implement a couple of algorithms on ibmq_16_melbourne, so I need to know if this device is able to handle with depth and size of my current circuit or ...
8
votes
1answer
125 views
Current limits on Grover search space
I was wondering why till date Grover search has been implemented only till 3 qubits (corresponding to size of database = 8). Refer this paper
The reason why I ask is that we have much larger sized ...
3
votes
0answers
45 views
Can “experimental data from a quantum computer” be used to test separability probability conjectures?
An article entitled "Experimental data from a quantum computer verifies the generalize Pauli exclusion principle" by Scott E. Smart, David I. Schuster, and David A. Mazziotti has just appeared
In the ...
4
votes
1answer
615 views
D-Wave systems and IBM Q System One
What is the difference between the D-Wave systems and the newly-born IBM Q System One?
7
votes
2answers
561 views
How to explain in layman’s terms the significance of the difference of qubits of the D-Wave and IBM QX?
So, @AndrewO mentioned recently that he has had 'encounters' with people wondering why D-Wave has a lot more qubits than IBM. Of course, this comparison is faulty, since the IBM and D-Wave's machine ...
