Questions tagged [d-wave]

A quantum computing company, based in Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, mostly known for their quantum annealing computers. An early rendition of these, D-Wave One, was the first commercially available quantum computer. (Wikipedia)

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
3
votes
2answers
200 views

Why D-Wave 2000Q requires such a low pressure?

On the D-Wave 2000Q website, it is stated that the processor environment is kept "in a high vacuum: pressure is 10 billion times lower than atmospheric pressure". Why the pressure has to be such low? ...
31
votes
3answers
3k views

How do you write a simple program for a D-Wave device?

I would like to know how a job for a D-Wave device is written in code and submitted to the device. In the answer it would be best to see a specific example of this for a simple problem. I guess that ...
6
votes
1answer
227 views

Hardware wise, how does D-Wave achieve quantum annealing?

Quantum computers have shown a new way to compute old problems. D-Wave has a quantum annealer, and Wikipedia describes the D-Wave quantum computer and its use of quantum annealing properties. ...
9
votes
3answers
506 views

Is it important for a quantum computer to be shielded by the magnetic field?

I've been browsing The D-Wave 2000Q site when I bumped into this aspect of their quantum computers: A Unique Processor Environment Shielded to 50,000× less than Earth’s magnetic field Why is that ...
14
votes
2answers
4k views

Is Google's 72 qubit device better than D-Wave's machines, which feature more than 2000 qubits? [duplicate]

Google recently announced the Bristlecone 72 qubit quantum computer. However, D-Wave already announced quantum computers featuring more than $2000$ qubits. Why is Google's new device newsworthy then? ...
8
votes
2answers
740 views

How to explain in layman’s terms the significance of the difference of qubits of the D-Wave and IBM QX?

So, @AndrewO mentioned recently that he has had 'encounters' with people wondering why D-Wave has a lot more qubits than IBM. Of course, this comparison is faulty, since the IBM and D-Wave's machine ...
43
votes
2answers
6k views

Is there proof that the D-wave (one) is a quantum computer and is effective?

I'm admittedly a novice in this field, but I have read that, while the D-wave (one) is an interesting device, there is some skepticism regarding it being 1) useful and 2) actually a 'quantum computer'....
22
votes
2answers
2k views

Why can't quantum annealing be described by a gate model?

This is a question I was inspired to ask based on this question, which notes that quantum annealing is an entirely different model for computation than the usual circuit model. I've heard this before, ...
7
votes
2answers
423 views

How much faster is “D-Wave Two” compared to its predecessor?

I don't have any specific task or algorithm in mind, so depending on how they were tested – Is there any research which shows just how the D-Wave Two computer was faster (in terms of computation ...

1
2