1
$\begingroup$

I tried to measure quantum state with a quantum state tomography. However, I encountered a situation when two different quantum states had the same density matrix. In particular, these states were $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle + \frac{1+i}{2}|1\rangle$ and $\frac{1-i}{2}|0\rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle$.

My question is: Is there any possibility how to distinguish these two states (or any other two states with the same density matrix) with quantum state tomography?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Both of those states are same, they only differ by a global phase! $\endgroup$ – Hemant Nov 10 '19 at 23:15
3
$\begingroup$

There isn't. A density matrix encodes all the knowledge available about a state, therefore if two states are described by the same density matrix, they are indistinguishable.

Ket vectors differing by only a global phase have always the same density matrix, and represent the same physical state.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Right, that. I wrote a similar answer in parallel. :-) $\endgroup$ – Greg Kuperberg Nov 10 '19 at 23:58
  • $\begingroup$ I see now, thanks. $\endgroup$ – Martin Vesely Nov 11 '19 at 5:47
4
$\begingroup$

The question presupposes a misconception that the vector form of a state $|\psi\rangle$ exists independently of its density operator form $|\psi\rangle\langle\psi|$, which is often described as secondary. In reality, the density operator of a state is all that truly exists --- and even then, it only exists as statistical information. In fact, you can construct quantum mechanics using density operators $\rho$ as the primary model of states. The formalism for this is similar to the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics, in which operators evolve over time. In a Heisenberg-type picture, you don't strictly need Hilbert spaces at all at first, you can define everything with abstract "operators". You can introduce a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$ later as an algebra representation of all of the operators. You can also introduce vector states $|\psi\rangle$ later as a simplified formalism for operator states that happen to have the form $\rho = |\psi\rangle\langle\psi|$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.