1
$\begingroup$

Note: This question is a follow up of Approximating unitary matrices.


The decompositions provided in Approximating unitary matrices are correct and worked for me without problem.

But I am now facing an issue: I want to try to optimise my circuit, and the method I want to use restricts the gate-set I can afford to use. The solution given in the previous post is no longer usable for me, because the gate-set I can use does not contain all the gates used in the solution.

My problem is the following: I need to approximate the following quantum gate $$W = \begin{pmatrix} 1&0&0&0\\ 0&\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}&\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}&0\\ 0&\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}&\frac{-1}{\sqrt{2}}&0\\ 0&0&0&1 \\ \end{pmatrix}$$ with the gate-set $$ \left\{ H, X, R_\phi, \text{C}R_\phi, R_z, \text{C}R_z, \text{C}X, \text{CC}X \right\} $$ with $R_\phi$ defined as in Wikipedia, $R_z$ the rotation around the $Z$-axis and $\text{C}$ being a control (i.e. $\text{CC}X$ is the Toffoli gate, or double-controlled $X$ gate).

As shown by @Craig Gidney in his answer, this boils down to implement a controlled-$H$ gate with my gate-set, or equivalently a $R_y\left( \frac{\pi}{4} \right)$ gate.

I would love to have an exact decomposition, that is why I already tested:

  • Using the following formula $$U = e^{i\alpha} R_z(\beta) R_y(\gamma) R_z(\lambda).$$ As I only need to implement $R_y\left( \frac{\pi}{4}\right)$ I replaced $\gamma$ by $\frac{\pi}{4}$ and searched for values of $\beta$ and $\lambda$ that would result in a gate $U$ that I can implement easily with my gate-set. I did not succeed, but finding a solution to this alternative problem would solve my original problem as the equation above is equivalent to: $$R_y(\gamma) = e^{-i\alpha} R_z(-\beta) U R_z(-\lambda)$$ and $R_z$ is in my gate-set.

  • Trying to find a decomposition by playing with matrices, this approach did not work either, mostly because it was more random tries.

I no exact decomposition exist, I will end up using an algorithm like Solovay-Kitaev or Group Leader Optimisation, but introducing errors in this gate is a real issue as it is used extensively in all the quantum circuit.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

You would be better off trying to write $$ R_y(\pi/4)=e^{i\alpha}R_z(\beta)R_x(\gamma)R_z(\delta)=e^{i\alpha}R_z(\beta)HR_z(\gamma)HR_z(\delta) $$ and solving for the parameters in there.

By the way, what you're essentially interested in is $\sqrt{Z}R_x(\pi/4)\sqrt{Z}^\dagger$, up to some possible phases. Hopefully that indicates what angles of rotation you're going to be wanting.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.