2
$\begingroup$

It may look a silly question but anybody of you knows what's:

$$(|0\rangle+|1\rangle)\otimes(|0\rangle+|1\rangle)$$ (x: Kronecker operator)

$$(|0\rangle+|1\rangle)*(|0\rangle+|1\rangle)$$ (*: vector multiplication operator)

yielding?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The Kronecker product of the vectors will lead to

  • $|0\rangle=\begin{pmatrix}1\\0\end{pmatrix}$ and $|1\rangle=\begin{pmatrix}0\\1\end{pmatrix}$

  • $(|0\rangle+|1\rangle)\otimes(|0\rangle+|1\rangle)=|00\rangle+|01\rangle+|10\rangle+|11\rangle=\begin{pmatrix}1\\0\end{pmatrix}\otimes\begin{pmatrix}1\\0\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}1\\0\end{pmatrix}\otimes\begin{pmatrix}0\\1\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}0\\1\end{pmatrix}\otimes\begin{pmatrix}1\\0\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}0\\1\end{pmatrix}\otimes\begin{pmatrix}0\\1\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}1\\0\\0\\0\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}0\\1\\0\\0\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}0\\0\\1\\0\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}0\\0\\0\\1\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}1\\1\\1\\1\end{pmatrix}$

While the vector multiplication (which I assume that is the Vector inner product) is

  • $(|0\rangle+|1\rangle)*(|0\rangle+|1\rangle)=(|0\rangle+|1\rangle)^\dagger(|0\rangle+|1\rangle)=\langle0|0\rangle+\langle0|1\rangle+\langle1|0\rangle+\langle1|1\rangle=1+0+0+1=2.$
$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ It would be better to specify that the bra notation needs to be used for the first term? Else it is not a valid operation. $\endgroup$ Jun 20, 2019 at 8:41
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It is a valid operation because the dot product specifies such transposition of a vector. That's why I state that I assume the inner product. Obviously if such operation is the standard matrix product, then such operation would not be valid due to dimension mismatch. $\endgroup$ Jun 20, 2019 at 9:01
  • $\begingroup$ i see you turned the dirac notation into a normal vector notation, could you specify the resulting vector in dirac notation (or in states notation) ? $\endgroup$ Jun 20, 2019 at 9:37
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean exactly? Those vectors in the bracket notation that are shown in the question are not valid quantum states as they are not normalized, but considering them just as vectors is possible. $\endgroup$ Jun 20, 2019 at 10:19
  • $\begingroup$ I meant could you express the results in terms of states ? or in terms of dirac notation ? $\endgroup$ Jun 20, 2019 at 10:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.