7
$\begingroup$

Let $P$ be a projector and $Q = I-P$ be its complement. How to find probability $p$ and unitaries $U_1, U_2$ such that for any $\rho$, $P\rho P + Q\rho Q = p U_1\rho U_1^\dagger + (1-p)U_2\rho U_2^\dagger$? (This is Nielsen and Chuang Exercise 11.20)

I tried to spectral decompose $P = UU^\dagger$, where $U$ has $r$ columns with $r$ being the rank of $P$. This doesn't get me anywhere since $UU^\dagger$ is not of the form of a unitary.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

If $P$ is (ortho)projector, that is $P^2=P=P^\dagger$, then we can define unitary $U = I - 2P$. You can verify $$ UU^\dagger = U^2 = (I-2P)(I-2P) = I-4P+4P = I $$ Now we can express $P=\frac{1}{2}(I-U), Q=\frac{1}{2}(I+U)$ and calculate $$ P\rho P + Q\rho Q = \frac{1}{4}(I-U)\rho(I-U) + \frac{1}{4}(I+U)\rho(I+U)= $$ $$ = \frac{1}{4}(\rho - U\rho - \rho U + U\rho U) + \frac{1}{4}(\rho + U\rho + \rho U + U\rho U)= \frac{1}{2}(\rho + U\rho U) = \frac{1}{2}(\rho + U\rho U^\dagger) $$

Update
In general case we can use the fact that the channel $\rho \rightarrow \sum_{k=1}^n P_k \rho P_k$ is the composition of $n$ channels $\rho \rightarrow P_k \rho P_k + P_k^\perp \rho P_k^\perp$, $k=1,..,n$.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

I'll cover a slightly more general case.

Let $P_k$, $k=1,...,N$ a complete set of orthogonal projectors: $\sum_k P_k=I$ and $P_j P_k=\delta_{jk}P_j$.

Consider the map $\mathcal E(\rho)=\sum_k P_k \rho P_k$.

We want to find a set of unitaries $\mathcal U_k$ and probabilities $p_k$ such that $\mathcal E(\rho)=\sum_\ell p_\ell\mathcal U_\ell\rho\,\mathcal U_\ell$.

Define the unitaries $\mathcal U_k=\mathcal U_k^\dagger=I-2P_k$, $k=1,...,N$. We then have \begin{align} \sum_k\mathcal U_k\rho\,\mathcal{U}_k &=N\rho-2\sum_k\{P_k,\rho\}+4\sum_k P_k\rho P_k \\ &=(N-4)\rho+4\sum_k P_k\rho P_k. \end{align} Thus, $$\frac{1}{4}\sum_k \mathcal U_k\rho\,\mathcal U_k+\frac{4-N}{4}\rho=\sum_k P_k\rho P_k.\tag A$$ Lets work out explicitly a few cases:


$N=2$ case

This is the problem as originally stated (with $P_1=P$ and $P_2=Q$). We have $$\frac{1}{4}(\mathcal U_1\rho\,\mathcal U_1+\mathcal U_2\rho\,\mathcal U_2) +\frac{1}{2}\rho=P_1\rho P_1+P_2\rho P_2.$$

$N=3$ case

$$\frac{1}{4}(\mathcal U_1\rho\,\mathcal U_1+\mathcal U_2\rho\,\mathcal U_2+\mathcal U_3\rho\,\mathcal U_3) +\frac{1}{4}\rho =P_1\rho P_1+P_2\rho P_2+P_3\rho P_3.$$

$N=4$ case

$$\frac{1}{4}\sum_{k=1}^4 \mathcal U_k\rho\,\mathcal U_k=\sum_{k=1}^4 P_k\rho P_k.$$

$N>4$ case

Interestingly, this method stops working for $N>4$ (which of course does not mean that we cannot decompose these channels using unitaries, only that this particular decomposition method does not work anymore). More precisely, (A) still holds, but it's no longer a valid Kraus decomposition because $4-N<0$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ It's still possible to prove the general case. See the update of my answer. $\endgroup$
    – Danylo Y
    Jun 13, 2019 at 16:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.