7
$\begingroup$

How can a pure two-qubit state $|\psi\rangle = a |00\rangle + b|01\rangle + c|10\rangle + d|11\rangle$, be written in the following form

\begin{equation} |\psi_{\alpha}\rangle = \sqrt{\alpha}|01\rangle + \sqrt{1-\alpha} |10\rangle. \end{equation} How can one prove this. And what would be $\alpha$ in terms of $a,~b,~c,~d$?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It's impossible to rewrite the state into that form, since e.g. you lose the $|00\rangle$ term. I think you're talking about producing a different state but with the same entanglement entropy. $\endgroup$ – Craig Gidney Feb 16 at 23:22
  • $\begingroup$ You seem to have edited your question in such a way is to invalidate the previous answers and to ask a completely new question. Please revert back to the old question, and just ask a new, separate question. $\endgroup$ – DaftWullie Feb 23 at 6:39
  • $\begingroup$ I rolled back to the previous revision, as the new version had nothing to do with the (already accepted) answers, and made the post confusing. Just ask the other question in a separate thread $\endgroup$ – glS Feb 23 at 17:47
5
$\begingroup$

The trick is in the Schmidt decomposition - Following the theorem proof, we have two qubits, so two Hilbert spaces $H_1$ and $H_2$, both with dimension 2, with the bases defined as $\left\lbrace\left|e_0\right> = \left|0\right>_1,\, \left|e_1\right>=\left|1\right>_1 \right\rbrace$ and $\left\lbrace\left|f_0\right> = \left|0\right>_2,\, \left|f_1\right>=\left|1\right>_2 \right\rbrace$.

This defines a tensor $w = \sum_{i, j=0}^1\beta_{i, j}\left|i\right>_1\otimes\left|j\right>_2$. That is, $\beta_{00} = a, \,\beta_{01} = b, \,\beta_{10} = c$ and $\beta_{11} = d$.

We then write this as an $n\times n$ matrix $$M_w = \begin{pmatrix}\beta_{00} && \beta_{01} \\ \beta_{10} && \beta_{11}\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}a && b \\ c && d\end{pmatrix}.$$

Now that we've got a matrix, we want to diagonalise it, so we perform a Singular Value Decomposition (SVD). That is, we want to write $M_w = UDV^\dagger$, where $D$ is a diagonal matrix (with the elements known as the 'singular values') and $U$ and $V$ and unitary $n\times n$ matrices. Or rather, to save having to do a chunk of maths, we know that the columns (also, rows) of both $U$ and $V$ each form an orthonormal basis - I'll call these $\left\lbrace\left|u_0\right>,\, \left|u_1\right>\right\rbrace$ and $\left\lbrace\left|v_0\right>,\, \left|v_1\right>\right\rbrace$.

Helpfully, the expression for the singular values of a $2\times2$ matrix is analytic: $$\sigma_{\pm} = \sqrt{\left|z_0\right|^2 + \left|z_1\right|^2 + \left|z_2\right|^2 + \left|z_3\right|^2 \pm \sqrt{\left(\left|z_0\right|^2 + \left|z_1\right|^2 + \left|z_2\right|^2 + \left|z_3\right|^2\right)^2 - \left|z_0^2 - z_1^2 - z_2^2 - z_3^2\right|^2}},$$ where \begin{align*}z_0 &= \frac{1}{2}\left(a+d\right) \\ z_1 &= \frac{1}{2}\left(b+c\right) \\ z_2 &= \frac{i}{2}\left(b-c\right) \\ z_3 &= \frac{1}{2}\left(a-d\right). \end{align*} This in turn gives $$\sigma_\pm= \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}\pm\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}-\left|ad - bc\right|^2}},$$ as a result of the normalisation condition $\left|a\right|^2 + \left|b\right|^2 + \left|c\right|^2 + \left|d\right|^2 = 1$. As $\sigma_+^2 + \sigma_-^2 = 1$, I'll redefine $\sigma_+ = \sqrt{\alpha}$ and $\sigma_- = \sqrt{\left(1-\alpha\right)}$, for reasons that should become clear below.

We can now write $M_w = \sqrt\alpha\left|u_0\rangle\langle v_0\right| + \sqrt{1-\alpha}\left|u_1\rangle\langle v_1\right|$.

'Rewriting' this as a tensor (as at the beginning1) gives a state $$\left|\psi_\alpha\right> = \sqrt\alpha\left|u_0\right\rangle\otimes\left|v_0\right\rangle + \sqrt{1-\alpha}\left|u_1\right\rangle\otimes\left|v_1\right\rangle,$$ which is equivalent to what you have by defining $\left\lbrace\left|u_0\right> = \left|0\right>_u,\, \left|u_1\right>=\left|1\right>_u \right\rbrace$ and $\left\lbrace\left|v_0\right> = \left|1\right>_v,\, \left|v_1\right>=\left|0\right>_v \right\rbrace$, where $$\alpha= \frac{1}{2}+\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}-\left|ad - bc\right|^2}$$


Calculating $M_w$:

$\left|u_0\right>$ is the left column of $U$ and $\left|u_1\right>$, the right column. Similarly, for $V$, $\left|v_0\right>$ is the left column and $\left|v_1\right>$, the right. This means that I can write $$U = \begin{pmatrix}\left|u_0\right> && \left|u_1\right>\end{pmatrix}$$ and $$V^{\dagger} = \begin{pmatrix}\left<v_0\right| \\ \left<v_1\right|\end{pmatrix}$$ so that $$M_w = UDV^\dagger = \begin{pmatrix}\left|u_0\right> && \left|u_1\right>\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\sqrt\alpha && 0 \\ 0 && \sqrt{1-\alpha}\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\left<v_0\right| \\ \left<v_1\right|\end{pmatrix},$$ which can be simplified as $M_w = \sqrt\alpha\left|u_0\rangle\langle v_0\right| + \sqrt{1-\alpha}\left|u_1\rangle\langle v_1\right|$.


1 Even as a non-mathematician, I feel guilty just doing this

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, @Mithrandir24601. That is superb! $\endgroup$ – Tobias Fritzn Feb 15 at 5:55
  • $\begingroup$ @user149973 If you feel this answer was helpful for you, considering accepting it. $\endgroup$ – Sanchayan Dutta Feb 16 at 12:58
  • $\begingroup$ @Mithrandir24601, could you be little detailed on two things. Firstly, the place where you introduced M_w matrix, which contains the coefficients of expansion of the original state. Any motivation for defining M_w this way? Secondly, how did you conclude M_w = \sqrt{\alpha} |u_o><v_o| + \sqrt{1-\alpha} |u_1><v_1| ? $\endgroup$ – Tobias Fritzn Feb 16 at 17:09
  • $\begingroup$ There is little confusion regarding the notation here. In the link given in your answer, M_w seems like a scalar (element of the matrix), while as in your definition above, it is a matrix itself. $\endgroup$ – Tobias Fritzn Feb 16 at 20:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @user149973 If you're interested in motivation for $M_w$, it might be worth seeing how it connects to my answer: $M_wM_w^\dagger$ is the reduced density matrix on qubit 1, and $M_w^\dagger M_w$ is the reduced density matrix on qubit 2. $\endgroup$ – DaftWullie Feb 18 at 8:49
6
$\begingroup$

Mithrandir's answer perfectly covers the functional details, but to state a clear response to the question...

It is not true that any two-qubit state $a|00\rangle+b|01\rangle+c|10\rangle+d|11\rangle$ can be written in the form $\sqrt{\alpha}|01\rangle+\sqrt{1-\alpha}|10\rangle$. Obviously, you can only get equality here if $a=0$ and $d=0$.

However, what you can do is a change of basis. An equivalent way of saying this is that there exists unitaries $U_A$ and $U_B$ such that $$ (U_A\otimes U_B)(a|00\rangle+b|01\rangle+c|10\rangle+d|11\rangle)=\sqrt{\alpha}|01\rangle+\sqrt{1-\alpha}|10\rangle $$

With that clarification, you could now follow Mithrandir's proof. I think of it in a different way (where you don't need to know what the singular value decomposition is, but you do need to know about the reduced density matrix). Consider the reduced density matrix of each way of writing the state, where we restrict to just the first qubit. We have $$ \rho_1=U_A\left((a|0\rangle+c|1\rangle)(a^\star\langle 0|+c^\star\langle 1|)+(b|0\rangle+d|1\rangle)(b^\star\langle 0|+d^\star\langle 1|)\right)U_A^\dagger\\=\alpha|0\rangle\langle 0|+(1-\alpha)|1\rangle\langle 1|. $$ Clearly, the right-hand side is diagonal, so $U_A$ must be the unitary that diagonalises the left-hand side. In other words, $\alpha$ and $1-\alpha$ are the eigenvalues of the matrix $$ \left(\begin{array}{cc} |a|^2+|b|^2 & ac^\star+bd^\star \\ a^\star c+b^\star d & |c|^2+|d|^2 \end{array}\right). $$ The $U_A$ always exists because that matrix is Hermitian. Similarly, $U_B$ is the unitary rotation that diagonalises the reduced density matrix on the second qubit.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.