Am I correct in thinking that post-quantum cryptography such as lattice-based solutions run on classical computers are resistant to quantum attacks (as opposed to RMS), whereas quantum key distribution schemes such as the BB84 are designed to run on quantum computers to communicate between them?

  • 2
    "Am I correct"-type questions are not well suited for here. I mean, what would be an answer: "Yes"? – Norbert Schuch Oct 7 at 14:29
  • Short answer: 1. Yes, you are right. 2. You don't need a full QC to run BB84, just some quantum device (which, I guess, is what you mean). – Norbert Schuch Oct 7 at 14:29

Post-quantum crypto schemes run on classical computers and are hoped to be secure against quantum attacks. Quantum key distribution such as bb84 or e91 run on quantum hardware (although does not require the full power of a quantum computer) and is provably secure (subject to certain underlying assumptions about lab security etc) against quantum attack.

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.