1
$\begingroup$

I've been reading the following lecture notes in which two isomorphisms are defined:

  • vectorization: $\text{vec}:B(H_A,H_B)\to H_A\otimes H_B$ and
  • the Choi-Jamiołkowski isomorphism: $C:B(B(H_A), B(H_B )) \to B(H_A \otimes H_B )$ where $H_A, H_B$ are Hilbert spaces and $B(H)$ is the space of bounded linear operators on the Hilbert space $H.$

The graphical representation for $\text{vec}(A)$ is drawn on page 4, and reproduced here for convenience:

this

I think I understand it, but I'm struggling to draw a similarly intuitive picture of $C(L)$ for $L\in B(B(H_A), B(H_B))$

I'm aware that they are effectively equivalent, but I'd like to draw a diagram that would let me see immediately e.g. the identity listed as Lemma 1.3: $C(L) = (id_A\otimes L) (\omega_{d_A})$ (for $\omega_{d_A}$ the density matrix describing the $d_A$ dimensional maximally entangled state, or generalized Bell state) as well as similar such calculations.

Put simply, if $\text{vec}(A)$ is given by the picture above, what is $C(L)?$

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ (OP has cross-posted this on phys.SE: link) $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 13 at 5:25
  • $\begingroup$ > for $\omega_{d_A}$ the $d_A$ dimensional maximally mixed density matrix Do you mean maximally entangled state? If so, it's the same picture, you just add a second arc $\supset \subset$ to get the density matrix for the maximally entangled state. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 13 at 6:21
  • $\begingroup$ related: quantumcomputing.stackexchange.com/q/11580/55, quantumcomputing.stackexchange.com/a/21168/55 (see picture in last part of the answer) $\endgroup$
    – glS
    Commented Aug 13 at 10:36
  • $\begingroup$ @RefikMansuroglu Yes, that's also in the handout I linked. What I'm nusure about is how to draw the rest of the picture. How do I represent $C$ and $C(L)?$ $\endgroup$
    – Luke
    Commented Aug 13 at 10:54

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You can use the Kraus operators $K_i$ of $L$ and write

Choi matrix

EDIT: Of course, this requires the existence of Kraus operators, which is equivalent to $L$ being completely positive.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.