1
$\begingroup$

The $S$ gate has the following effect (when applied to a Pauli operator $P$ by conjugation $SPS^{\dagger}$):

$$S: X \rightarrow Y $$ $$S: Z \rightarrow Z $$

The logical operators for the $[[4,2,2]]$ code can be defined as follows: $$X_{L1}= XIXI$$ $$X_{L2}=XXII$$ $$Z_{L1}=ZZII$$ $$Z_{L2}=ZIZI$$

I have introduce $SSSS$ as a potential new logical gate for the $[[4,2,2]]$ code. I want to find its logical effect on the logical operators.

I know that $$SSSS: XIXI \rightarrow YIYI $$ $$SSSS: XXII \rightarrow YYII$$ $$SSSS: ZZII \rightarrow ZZII$$ $$SSSS: ZIZI \rightarrow ZIZI$$

In other words, if we denote $SSSS$ as $S_{L}$, then:

$$S_{L}: X_{L1} \rightarrow - X_{L1}Z_{L2} $$ $$S_{L}: X_{L2} \rightarrow - X_{L2}Z_{L1} $$ $$S_{L}: Z_{L1} \rightarrow Z_{L1} $$ $$S_{L}: Z_{L2} \rightarrow Z_{L2} $$

I have read on this post that $S_{L}$ implements a logical $CZ$ times a logical $ZZ$. However, I do not understand how this is the case.

Let me implement a logical $CZ$ followed by a logical $ZZ$ on the following, to check if the effect is the same:

$$X\otimes I \xrightarrow{CZ} X \otimes Z \xrightarrow{ZZ} ZX \otimes I$$ $$I \otimes X \xrightarrow{CZ} Z \otimes X \xrightarrow{ZZ} I \otimes ZX$$ $$Z \otimes I \xrightarrow{CZ} Z \otimes I \xrightarrow{ZZ} I \otimes Z$$ $$ I \otimes Z \xrightarrow{CZ} I \otimes Z \xrightarrow{ZZ} Z \otimes I$$

Which instead seems to have the effect:

$X_{L1} \rightarrow -X_{L1}Z_{L1}$

$X_{L2} \rightarrow -X_{L2}Z_{L2}$

$Z_{L1} \rightarrow Z_{L2} $

$Z_{L2} \rightarrow Z_{L1}$

Can anyone identify where I am going wrong?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

When checking the effect of $CZ$ and $ZZ$ on the 4 Pauli strings, you have to use conjugation for each of the two transformations (as you do it for $S$).

You applied this correctly for the $CZ$ conjugations, for example: $CZ (X\otimes I) CZ = X \otimes Z$.

But your $ZZ$ conjugations are incorrect. It should be:

$$ (Z\otimes Z) (X \otimes Z) (Z \otimes Z) = - X\otimes Z$$

and likewise for the others. With correct application of $ZZ$ conjugation, the two results will agree.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.