2
$\begingroup$

I would like to study the effects of non-computational levels of two coupled qubits by a resonator using QuTiP. The idea is to consider the following Hamiltonians

Qubits Hamiltonian $$ H_{q_i} = \sum_n 4E_C (n-n_g)^2|n\rangle\langle n| + \frac{E_J}{2}(|n+1\rangle\langle n|+|n\rangle\langle n+1|) $$

Resonator Hamiltonian $$ H_r = \omega_r a^\dagger a $$

Free Hamiltonian $$ H_0 = H_{q_1} \otimes H_{q_2} \otimes H_r $$

Interacting Hamiltonian $$ H_{1r} = Q_1\otimes \mathbb{I} \otimes Q_r/C = -2i\beta_1 e V_\text{rms} N_{q_1} \otimes \mathbb{I} \otimes (a - a^\dagger) $$ $$ H_{2r} = \mathbb{I} \otimes Q_2 \otimes Q_r/C = \mathbb{I} \otimes -2i\beta_2 e V_\text{rms} N_{q_2} \otimes (a - a^\dagger) $$ $$ H_\text{int} = H_{1r} + H_{2r} $$

where $N_{q_i}$ is the number operator in the energy basis, $\beta_i = \frac{C_{g_i}}{C_{g_i} + C_{s_i}}$ which is proportional to the coupling capacitance between the qubit and the resonator, and the shunt capacitance.

Total Hamiltonian $$ H = H_0 + H_\text{int} $$

After instantiating these Hamiltonians I want to use the Schrieffer-Wolff Transformation to get an effective Hamiltonian limited to the computational levels and decoupled from the resonator.

The basic idea is to implement the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation to reduce the transmon Hamiltonian (multiple levels) to an effective Hamiltonian (two levels).

$$ H = H_0 + \varepsilon V$$

introducing the unitary transformation

$$ e^{\varepsilon S} H e^{-\varepsilon S}$$

where $\varepsilon$ is small, $\exp{(\varepsilon S)}$ is unitary and $S$ anti-hermitian. By expanding the expression using the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula

$$ e^{\varepsilon S} H e^{-\varepsilon S} = H + \varepsilon[S, H] + \frac{\varepsilon^2}{2}[S, [S, H]] + O(\varepsilon^2) = H_0 + \varepsilon(V + [S, H_0]) + \frac{\varepsilon^2}{2}(2[S,V] + [S,[S,H_0]]) + O(\varepsilon^2)$$

The Schrieffer-Wolff transformation chooses $S$ such that

$$V + [S, H_0] = 0$$

which is known as Sylvester equation. What remains is

$$e^{\varepsilon S} H e^{-\varepsilon S} = H_0 + \frac{\varepsilon^2}{2}[S,V] + O(\varepsilon^2)$$

By defining the projectors $P$ on the low-energy space. The low-energy effective Hamiltonian becomes

$$H_\text{eff} = P(H_0 + \frac{\varepsilon^2}{2}[S,V] )P$$

# Eigenvectors
_, eigenvectors_q1 = q1.h.eigenstates()
_, eigenvectors_q2 = q2.h.eigenstates()
_, eigenvectors_r = r.h.eigenstates()

# Projectors (|0><0|+|1><1|) ⊗ (|0><0|+|1><1|) ⊗ Identity
# Each tensor product is an energy eigenstate of qubits' Hamiltonian, for the resonator an identity is used
# Qubit 1 ⊗ Qubit 2 ⊗ Resonator
p = tensor(eigenvectors_q1[0] * eigenvectors_q1[0].dag() + eigenvectors_q1[1] * eigenvectors_q1[1].dag(), eigenvectors_q2[0] * eigenvectors_q2[0].dag() + eigenvectors_q2[1] * eigenvectors_q2[1].dag(), qeye(r.dim))

# S matrix from Sylvester equation (https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.linalg.solve_sylvester.html)
s = Qobj(solve_sylvester(-h0.full(), h0.full(), -hint.full()))

# Effective Hamiltonian
heff = Qobj(h0.full() + 0.5 * commutator(s.full(), hint.full()))

# Reduced Hamiltonian
hred = Qobj(p * heff.full() * p)

When I use hred as the Hamiltonian for the Master Equation and I use psi100 as the initial state

psi100 = tensor(eigenvectors_q1[1], eigenvectors_q2[0], eigenvectors_r[0])
psi010 = tensor(eigenvectors_q1[1], eigenvectors_q2[0], eigenvectors_r[0])
t_list = np.linspace(0, 20, 1000)
result = mesolve(H=hred, rho0=psi[1,0,0], tlist=t_list, c_ops=[], e_ops=[], args={})

There is no exchange between states psi100 and psi010, when I would expect, in an ideal two-level system an iSWAP implementation. Or at least some kind of interaction.

As for the Hamiltonian definitions, I am quite sure that they are okay. Where I have some doubts is about the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation, I might have wrong implemented some steps or I am missing some diagonalizations, wrong states, and wrong projector definition.

$\endgroup$

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.