I think the issue here is the definition of Absolutely Maximally Entangled (AME) states on Wikipedia, which you are quoting. I had not heard of AME states before, but after coming across your question, I went into a rabbit hole of reading some papers.
In the paper Goyeneche et al.(2015)[arXiv:1506.08857] they define AME states in the Section $\text{II(A)}$ as
Entangled states of $N$-party systems, such that tracing out arbitrary
$N − k$ subsystems, the remaining $k$ subsystems have associated a
maximally mixed state. Such states are often called $k$-uniform
and by construction, the integer number $k$ cannot exceed
$N/2$.
So you can see here, for GHZ state, $N=3$ and hence, maximum value of $k$ would be
$$\text{max(k)} = \left\lfloor \frac{N}{2} \right\rfloor = \left\lfloor \frac{3}{2} \right\rfloor = 1\,.$$
So, for tracing out any $N-k = 3-1 = 2$ qubits from 3 qubits, it should leave the remaining $k=1$ qubit in the maximally entangled state. You can trace over any of the possible pairs of qubits ({0, 1}, {1, 2}, {0, 2}), and you are left with the same reduced density matrix, $I/2$.
Hence, we can confirm that the GHZ state is an AME state according to the definition mentioned above. Goyeneche et al. (2015) also confirms this in Section $\text{III(A)}$:
In the case of three qubits the well-known GHZ state is an AME.