3
$\begingroup$

I have given the following Hamiltonian

$$\tilde H = - J_x (X_0 X_1 + X_2 X_3) - J_z (Z_0 Z_2 + Z_1 Z_3) - h\sum_j X_j + Z_j$$

Where, for example, $X_0 = \sigma^x \otimes I \otimes I \otimes I$ and I should Implement the time evolution of this Hamiltonian with Trotter Suzuki Simulations with the following term:

$$e^{i \tilde H t} \approx \left( e^{-i X_0 X_1 \, J_x t/n} e^{-i X_2 X_3 \, J_x t/n} e^{-i Z_0 Z_2 \, J_z t/n} e^{-i Z_1 Z_3 J_z \, t/n}\prod_j e^{-i(X_j +Z_j)\, ht/n} \right)^n$$

So I'm still at the first part $e^{-i X_0 X_1 \, J_x t/n}$ because I can't find a way to express this with single qubit Gates and CNOTs. At first thought, I could use an Rx Rotation around the X-axis for the qubit 0 and a CNot with the first qubit as the control and the second as the target qubit. But Now I noticed (or at least I guess) that I need to multiply the Qubit 2 and 3 also with this value. By now we have just seen in the lecture that $e^{i\frac{\theta}{2}\sigma^x} = R_x(\theta)$ and the same for $\sigma^z$. I would be very thankful to get an idea how I can implement this so I can adapt it to the Rest of the Hamiltonian.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I found out, that one can do that using the $Z$-rotations instead of $X$-rotations because the $Z$-rotation is already diagonal. that makes it way easier to see what $e^{\sigma^{z}}$ should be. So one can implement $e^{-i\theta X_1X_2}$ with $$ \big(H \otimes H \big) \cdot CNOT_{1\to2} \cdot \big(I \otimes R_z(2\theta) \big)\cdot CNOT_{1\to2} \cdot \big(H \otimes H\big)\,.$$If anything is wrong feel free to correct me. (I just didn't want to leave the question open when I think I got the answer).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.