I've been reading about quantum channels from a couple of sources and have some doubts regarding some mathematical perspectives and properties of quantum channels. I've listed them below:

  1. It is known that quantum channels map density operators on Hilbert space (say $\mathcal{H}_A$ to another space (say, $\mathcal{H}_B$). Is it the standard convention to express any channel as a liner map $\mathcal{N}:D(\mathcal{H}_A) \rightarrow D(\mathcal{H}_B)$ or is $\mathcal{N}:B(\mathcal{H}_A) \rightarrow B(\mathcal{H}_B)$ more appropriate? Here $D(\mathcal{H})$ is the set of density operators on Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$ while $B(\mathcal{H}$ is the space of bounded linear operators.

  2. In some texts, some effort is made to differentiate channels as linear maps instead of linear operators. But aren't linear maps the same as linear operators acting on a higher dimension? Or are there some properties unique to linear maps to require such an emphasis?

  3. Finally, are quantum channels bounded maps? Based on my naive reasoning, I think they should be bounded, given that they map density operators to density operators (which are known to be bounded). I wanted to know if there is a situation or an example for which this would fail.

It would be great if you could drop the link to those questions that have been answered already. Thanks!


2 Answers 2

  1. A linear map defined on density operators is uniquely extendible on the set of all linear operators (in finite-dimensional case). Simply because any linear operator is a linear combination of density operators.

  2. Yes, linear maps can be regarded as linear operators acting on a space of linear operators. But, in contrast to vectors, linear operators have additional important properties. We can multiply them (take composition) and consider their properties, like spectrum, invertibility, etc. We don't do this for vectors. Quantum channels is a subclass of linear maps that preserve specific properties of operators.

  3. To answer this question we need to introduce a norm on the spaces of linear operators (matrices). Though, the most common norms (e.g. Frobenius, 2-norm and trace norm) are equivalent in the case of finite dimensional spaces. Quantum channels are indeed bounded for those norms. Furthermore, they are completely bounded (there is a concept of completely bounded norm, see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_channel#The_cb-norm_of_a_channel and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond_norm).


To complement Danylo's great answer, let me go into a bit more details about the infinite-dimensional case and point out that the correct extension of a channel $\mathcal{N}:D(\mathcal{H}_A) \rightarrow D(\mathcal{H}_B)$ defined only on states is $\mathcal{N}:B^1(\mathcal{H}_A) \rightarrow B^1(\mathcal{H}_B)$ where $B^1$ denotes the trace class. Roughly speaking, the trace class is the largest subset of $B(\mathcal H)$ for which the expression $\sum_j\langle g_j|A|g_j\rangle$ converges absolutely for every orthonormal basis $\{g_j\}_j$ of $\mathcal H$, see this math.SE post or Proposition 16.18 in "Introduction to Functional Analysis" (1997) by Meise & Vogt; given that the trace is essential to the concept of density operators this seems quite reasonable. The claimed unique linear extension of $\mathcal N $ then comes from the fact that every matrix (trace-class operator) can be written as the linear combination of at most four states.

Moreover, every quantum channel (acting on the trace class) is bounded with operator norm $\|\mathcal N\|_{1\to 1}=\sup_{A\in\mathcal B^1(\mathcal H_A),\|A\|_1=1}\|\mathcal N(A)\|_1=1$ as well as diamond norm $\|\mathcal N\|_\diamond:=\sup_{n\in\mathbb N}\|\mathcal N\otimes{\rm id}_n\|_{1\to 1}=1$, where $\|A\|_1:={\rm tr}(\sqrt{A^\dagger A})$ is the usual trace norm (which turns $\mathcal B^1$ into a Banach space). The norms being equal to $1$ then is a consequence of the Russo-Dye theorem together with the usual Schrödinger-Heisenberg duality of channels. For further reading on channels and general quantum information in infinite dimensions refer, e.g., to Davies' book "Quantum Theory of Open Systems" (1976) or Heinosaari & Ziman, "The Mathematical Language of Quantum Theory" (2012).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.