2
$\begingroup$

Let $ \mathcal{C}^{(t)} $ denote the $ t $ level of the $ n $ qubit Clifford hierarchy.

Let $ \mathcal{F}^{(t)} $ denote the collection of all diagonal gates in $ \mathcal{C}^{(t)} $. $ \mathcal{C}^{(t)} $ is not a group for $ t \geq 3 $ see

Is there a closure property for the entire Clifford hierarchy?

However, $ \mathcal{F}^{(t)} $ is a group by proposition 4 of Semi-Clifford operations, structure of $ \mathcal{C}^{(t)} $ hierarchy, and gate complexity for fault-tolerant quantum computation.

The introduction to Climbing the Diagonal Clifford Hierarchy claims that the group $ \mathcal{F}^{(t)} $ is generated by $ C^i Z^{1/2^j} $ with $ i+j=t-1 $ ($ C^i $ means $ i $ control qubits so also $ i \leq n $). The reference given is Semi-Clifford operations, structure of $ \mathcal{C}^{(t)} $ hierarchy, and gate complexity for fault-tolerant quantum computation. However as far as I can tell Semi-Clifford operations, structure of $ \mathcal{C}^{(t)} $ hierarchy, and gate complexity for fault-tolerant quantum computation only proves the claim for $ n=3, t=3 $ (Proposition 9) and not for general $ n $ and $ t $.

Am I missing something? Is there any easy way to show directly that this forms a generating set?

Or perhaps there is an easy way to read this claim out of the results in Diagonal gates in the Clifford hierarchy ?

Ok I think I must be missing something because page 4 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.05398.pdf also attributes this same result to the same paper.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

First note that any diagonal gate on qubits can be written as some product of $U=\exp (i\theta_j \vec{Z}_j)$ where $\vec{Z}_j$ is any qubit Pauli $Z$ string.

In Diagonal gates in the Clifford Hierarchy (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.11923.pdf) they show that a diagonal gate on qubits is in the Clifford Hierarchy iff it can be written as a product of $U=\exp (i\theta_j \vec{Z}_j)$ with $\theta_j = \frac{a\pi}{2^k}$ for integers $a,k$. If you include the Identity string (which is just a global phase) there are $2^n$ $Z$ strings which is the same number of entries in an $n$-qubit diagonal gate ($2^n - 1$ if you prefer you gates in $SU(2^n)$ vs $U(2^n)$).

Now, on $n$ qubits there are $n$ single-qubit Pauli $Z$ rotations, $\binom{n}{2}$ diagonal gates with 2-qubit support ($CZ$ like), $\binom{n}{3}$ diagonal gates with 3-qubit support ($CCZ$ like), etc. If you add up all the $C^iZ$-like gates on $n$ qubits (which includes diagonal gates at various levels in $\mathcal{CH}$) and include the identity you get $2^n$ gates. You just have to show that these gates are independent and then they also form a basis for all diagonal gates in $\mathcal{CH}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.