3
$\begingroup$

Assume we have a quantum channel $\Phi$. The single qubit Pauli basis is $\sigma_0, \sigma _1, \sigma_2, \sigma_3$. Now we apply $\Phi$ to Pauli basis and get $\gamma_0=\Phi(\sigma_0), \gamma_1 = \Phi(\sigma_1), \gamma_2=\Phi(\sigma_2), \gamma_3 = \Phi(\sigma_3)$. My question is whether $\gamma_0, \gamma_1, \gamma_2, \gamma_3 $ forms a basis.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

8
$\begingroup$

No, not necessarily. For example, the channel $\Phi(\rho) = \operatorname{Tr}(\rho) \vert 0 \rangle \langle 0 \vert$ makes $\{\Phi(\sigma_0), \ldots, \Phi(\sigma_3)\}$ linearly dependent. (In fact, the three outputs corresponding to the traceless Pauli matrices are the all-zero matrices in this case.)

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

As a more general statement: a linear operator always sends linearly independent vectors in its support into linearly independent vectors in its image.

In other words, if $\{\mathbf v_k\}$ is a basis for some finite-dimensional space $V$, and $A$ is an operator on $V$, then $\{A\mathbf v_k\}$ is a basis iff $A$ is injective, i.e. $\ker(A)=\{0\}$.

So in the case of channels, you have to look at whether any of the Pauli matrices is in the ker of $\Phi$. If none are, then $\Phi$ is injective (as an operator on the space of Hermitian operators), and thus sends the Pauli matrices (or any other operatorial basis of Hermitian operators) into another basis.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.