I have a few questions regarding dynamics rescaling for zero noise extrapolation. In the paper Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits, in equation (30), they write

We redefine $T \rightarrow T^{\prime}=c T$ as well as $J_\alpha(t) \rightarrow J_\alpha^{\prime}(t)=c^{-1} J_\alpha\left(c^{-1} t\right) $ from which also $ \rho(t) \rightarrow \rho^{\prime}(t)=\rho\left(c^{-1} t\right) (30)$

We claim that this rescaling maps $\rho_\lambda^{\prime}\left(T^{\prime}\right)=\rho_{c \lambda}(T)$ if the noise operator $\mathcal{L}$ does not depend on the Hamiltonian couplings $J_\alpha(t)$ and is constant in time.

Context: $$ \rho_\lambda(T)=\rho(0)-i \int_0^T[K(t), \rho(t)] d t+\lambda \int_0^T \mathcal{L}(\rho(t)) d t . $$

We can now choose a re-parametrization of the evolution $c^{-1} J_\alpha\left(c^{-1} t\right)$ and an increased runtime $c T$, and write $$ \rho_\lambda^{\prime}\left(T^{\prime}\right)=\rho(0)-i \int_0^{c T}\left[K^{\prime}(t), \rho^{\prime}(t)\right] d t+\lambda \int_0^{c T} \mathcal{L}\left(\rho^{\prime}(t)\right) d t $$ with $K^{\prime}(t)=\sum_\alpha c^{-1} J_\alpha\left(c^{-1} t\right) P_\alpha$. If we now substitute the integration variable according to $t=c t^{\prime}$, we have that $d t=c d t^{\prime}$, which leads to $$ \begin{aligned} \rho_\lambda^{\prime}\left(T^{\prime}\right) & =\rho(0)-i \int_0^T \sum_\alpha c^{-1} J_\alpha\left(t^{\prime}\right)\left[P_\alpha, \rho\left(t^{\prime}\right)\right] c d t^{\prime}+\lambda \int_0^T \mathcal{L}\left(\rho^{\prime}(t)\right) c d t^{\prime} \\ & =\rho(0)-i \int_0^T \sum_\alpha\left[K\left(t^{\prime}\right), \rho\left(t^{\prime}\right)\right] d t^{\prime}+\lambda c \int_0^T \mathcal{L}\left(\rho\left(t^{\prime}\right)\right) d t^{\prime} \\ & =\rho_{c \lambda}(T) \end{aligned} $$

My questions:

  1. Why is equation (30) justified? How does rescaling T and J accomplish density matrix rescaling (equation 30) when both commutator and dissipator terms are present? Their claim will only be right if in the integral representation, one makes the substitution for $\rho'(t)=\rho(t/c)$.

If I just have local hamiltonian (unitary evolution, assuming hamiltonians at different times commute), then one can show that $\rho(t)$ is also rescaled as $\rho(t/c)$.


$U'(T,0)*\rho(0)*U'^{\dagger}(T,0)=\rho'(T)=\rho(T/c)$ where

$U(T,0)=exp(-i\int_0^T H(t)dt)$ and $U'(T,0)=exp(-i\int_0^T (1/c)*H(t/c)dt)=U(T/c,0)$

But here I have both Hamiltonian and noise term.

  1. What if I don't have a local hamiltonian evolution and have just the dissipator term, can I still make this claim?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.