2
$\begingroup$

Consider the (asymmetric) quantum discord, defined as (borrowing notation from Eq. 4.13c of Zurek's review): $$\mathcal D(\mathcal S:\mathcal A) = I(\mathcal S:\mathcal A) - \chi(\rho_{\mathcal A}),$$ where $$\chi(\rho_{\cal A}) \equiv \max_{\{\boldsymbol\pi_k\}}(H(\rho_{\mathcal A}) - \sum_k p_k H(\mathcal A|\boldsymbol\pi_k)).$$ Here we're considering bipartite states $\rho\equiv\rho_{\mathcal S\mathcal A}$, denoting with $I(\mathcal S:\mathcal A)$ the standard quantum mutual information, and the maximum is taken with respect to all possible POVMs $\{\boldsymbol\pi_k\}_k$, so that $\sum_k \boldsymbol\pi_k=I$ and $\boldsymbol\pi_k\ge0$. The outcome probabilities read $p_k\equiv \operatorname{tr}(\boldsymbol\pi_k \rho_{\cal SA})$, and $H(\mathcal A|\boldsymbol\pi_k)$ is the entropy of $\mathcal A$ conditioned on having measured $\mathcal S$ and found the $k$-th outcome, meaning that $H(\mathcal A|\boldsymbol\pi_k)$ is the (von Neumann) entropy of the state $\rho_k\equiv \operatorname{tr}_{\cal S}(\boldsymbol\pi_k\rho_{\cal SA})/p_k$.

It is mentioned in the above review (just above (4.12c)) that there are situations where the maximum in the definition of $\chi(\rho_{\cal A})$, or equivalently, the accessible mutual information, is achieved with non-projective POVMs. I'm looking for explicit "simple" examples of this being the case.

In (Modi et al. 2011) the authors mention (section I.3, page 11) that the discord is always optimized by rank-1 extremal POVMs. Most topical reviews (Modi et al. 2011, Modi 2013, Bera et al. 2017) mention the fact that the discord is in general achieved with non-projective POVMs, but I'm failing to actually extract an explicit simple examples from the provided citations. Going through the relevant references given in (Modi 2011), I see that (Chen et al. 2011) work out the discord for two-qubit X states. However, if I understand correctly, this is still a numerical result. (Galve et al. 2011) show that for rank-2 states PVMs are sufficient, but only show numerically that POVMs are more generally needed. (Shi et al. 2011) also analyze the discord of X-states and show that non-projective PVMs are needed, but also in this case I don't know how to extract an explicit example of such a state and associated POVM.

Is there any analytical example of a state where the discord/accessible information (be it the asymmetric or symmetric one) is achieved with non-projective measurements?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Zwolak and Zurek expressely state that this thesis arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0611157 proves that rank 1 projectors minimize discord. A few other papers do as well, though it may be it just minimized it withing the framework they are exploring. $\endgroup$ Feb 3, 2023 at 11:55
  • $\begingroup$ @GaussStrife I actually don't see any mention of discord or accessible information in that paper. Where do you mean exactly? Also, I know that by convexity arguments we can prove that the discord is always minimized by rank-1 extremal POVMs. This is also mentioned in the linked reviews. That's not the same as saying it's minimized by rank-1 projectors (meaning projective measurements I suppose). Is that what you meant? $\endgroup$
    – glS
    Feb 3, 2023 at 13:02
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, this was the thesis arxiv.org/pdf/0807.4490.pdf. Yes I am aware that the general proof is with POVM's, which that thesis shows. The paper where Zurek states rank 1 projectors minimize it is this one nature.com/articles/srep01729. $\endgroup$ Feb 6, 2023 at 13:18

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.