0
$\begingroup$

I am Elijah I'm interested in Drug Discovery and Materials Simulation. I want to purchase a gate based Quantum Simulator for research. I received a proposal.

  • Full State Simulator 30 Qubits on Laptop, 40 Qubits on a 1U Rack. No GPU, No HDD, SWAP Space used.
  • 100% accurate results within the usual limitations of measurement uncertainty and c128 precision.

My question is - I have been hearing for quite sometime that Nvidia QODA and ATOS QLM are the best Quantum Simulators in the world. How does the above compare with them?

[Update - I asked the Vendor to do a Live Benchmarking Exercise with me watching]

Here is the benchmark. Will post another update once I do a comparative benchmark with qsim.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ At the very least you should compare with using a high performance open source simulator such as qsim on your laptop. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 25, 2023 at 19:49
  • $\begingroup$ Appreciate the feedback Craig. I will post an update with qsim benchmarks soon. Let me know if it help readers help me make a choice between all the possible options, I believe there are 100's of them. I'm not an expert in quantum computing. Thanks for everything. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 28, 2023 at 5:56
  • $\begingroup$ QODA is in waitlist. And I don't have access to an ATOS Appliance. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 28, 2023 at 5:57
  • $\begingroup$ Can you share what specific benchmark, or type of benchmark,.you are using? I thought the world record of full state simulation is about 49 qubits. Given that 50 qubits consume just a quarter of a Gigabyte, instead of the 2^50*sizeof(complex) points to a sparse implementation which could potentially perform super bad on densely populated state vectors. $\endgroup$
    – rhundt
    Commented Feb 1, 2023 at 2:37

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.