2
$\begingroup$

This question is related to this and this.

I am working on Qiskit to design QEC schemes.

My model works with Pauli errors.

I would like to give to my Pauli error channel probabilities $p_x,p_y,p_z$ corresponding to a fidelity $F$.

I could find here a way to map a depolarizing channel $\mathcal{D}_{\lambda}$, to its equivalent Pauli channel $\mathcal{P}_{p_x,p_y,p_z}$ with $p_x=p_y=p_z$. Hence, for this case, the first question would be enough.

However, I may need to customise the probabilities.

Stemming from the related questions, I need to solve the following equation:

$$\bar{F}(\mathcal{P}_{p_x,p_y,p_z}) = \int \langle\varphi|\mathcal{P}_{p_x,p_y,p_z}(|\varphi\rangle\langle\varphi|)|\varphi\rangle\ d\varphi$$

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

TL;DR: Two steps. First, we find the entanglement fidelity $F_e(\mathcal{P}_{p_x,p_y,p_z})=1-(p_x+p_y+p_z)$. Next, we use Horodecki's formula that connects the average and entanglement fidelities

$$ \overline{F}(\mathcal{E})=\frac{NF_e(\mathcal{E})+1}{N+1}\tag1 $$

to get

$$ \overline{F}(\mathcal{E})=1-\frac23(p_x+p_y+p_z).\tag2 $$

There is also an alternative approach that exploits the fact that Pauli eigenstates form a spherical 3-design.

Entanglement fidelity

There are many ways to quickly find the entanglement fidelity $F_e(\mathcal{E})$ of a channel $\mathcal{E}$. For example, it can be shown directly from the definition that $F_e(\mathcal{E})$ can be read off of the channel's Pauli transfer matrix (aka process matrix) $\chi(\mathcal{E})$. Namely, $F_e(\mathcal{E})$ is the diagonal element corresponding to the identity. In the present case, we have $\chi(\mathcal{P}_{p_x,p_y,p_z})=\mathrm{diag}(1-(p_x+p_y+p_z), p_x, p_y, p_z)$, so $F_e(\mathcal{P}_{p_x,p_y,p_z})=1-(p_x+p_y+p_z)$.

Alternatively, we can use the formula for $F_e(\mathcal{E})$ in terms of the channel's Kraus operators

$$ F_e(\mathcal{E})=\frac{1}{N^2}\sum_i|\mathrm{tr}K_i|^2\tag4 $$

c.f. equation $(9.135)$ on page $421$ in Nielsen & Chuang. For a Pauli channel all but one operators in $(4)$ have zero trace and once again we obtain $F_e(\mathcal{P}_{p_x,p_y,p_z})=1-(p_x+p_y+p_z)$.

Horodecki's formula

You can find a beautiful proof of formula $(1)$ in this paper. The key fact established in the course of the proof is that twirling$^1$ any channel produces a depolarizing channel with the same entanglement fidelity as the original channel.

You can also find a more technical but shorter proof of $(1)$ in this paper.

Spherical 2-designs

Alternatively, we can use a spherical 2-design to simplify the evaluation of the integral

$$ \overline{F}(\mathcal{P}_{p_x,p_y,p_z})=\int\langle\psi|\mathcal{P}_{p_x,p_y,p_z}(|\psi\rangle\langle\psi|)|\psi\rangle d\psi.\tag5 $$

Tetrahedron is the smallest spherical 2-design, but it is also not the most convenient to work with in this context. Instead, we can use an octahedron which is the smallest spherical 3-design. See this paper. This is convenient because the eigenstates of the Pauli operators form an octahedron. We get

$$ \overline{F}(\mathcal{P}_{p_x,p_y,p_z})=\frac{1}{|S|}\sum_{|\psi\rangle\in S}\langle\psi|\mathcal{P}_{p_x,p_y,p_z}(|\psi\rangle\langle\psi|)|\psi\rangle\tag6 $$

where $S=\{|0\rangle, |1\rangle, |+\rangle, |-\rangle, |{+i}\rangle, |{-i}\rangle\}$. We then calculate

$$ \begin{align} \overline{F}(\mathcal{P}_{p_x,p_y,p_z})&=\frac{1}{6}\left(6\cdot(1-(p_x+p_y+p_z)+2p_x+2p_y+2p_z\right)\\ &=\frac{1}{6}\left(6-4(p_x+p_y+p_z)\right)\\ &=1-\frac23(p_x+p_y+p_z)\tag7 \end{align} $$

in agreement with $(2)$.


$^1$ Twirl takes a channel and produces another channel by averaging the effect of the conjugation of the input channel by a Haar-random unitary.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.