1
$\begingroup$

I'm wondering if it is possible to build a 3-qubit quantum circuit that creates the following pure state: $$\frac{1}{2}\left(|000\rangle+|011\rangle+|101\rangle+|110\rangle\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left[1,0,0,1,0,1,1,0\right]^\intercal$$

This is an interesting state, because if we name the qubits $q_1$, $q_2$ and $q_3$, then this is an equal superposition of all combinations of $q_1,q_2\in\lbrace 0,1\rbrace$ and $q_3=q_1\oplus q_2$ (logical XOR), which is also the simplest probability distribution that you cannot define in terms of pairwise dependences.

In extension to this question: Does anyone know of a source that lists circuits for constructing all possible equal superpositions of subsets of basis states for $n$ qubits, i.e. $\boldsymbol{\alpha}/\sqrt{\lVert\boldsymbol{\alpha}\rVert_1}$ for all $\boldsymbol{\alpha}\in\lbrace 0,1\rbrace^{2^n}$?

Best regards!

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

You wish to prepare your state into the uniform superposition of three qubits $\{q_1,q_2,q_3\}$ such that $q_3=q_1\oplus q_2$, starting from some canonical basis element (which is conventionally the all-zeroes ket).

The following will work to prepare such a state:

Circuit for smueke state

See the direct Quirk link.

Generalizing this to more than three qubits, say to prepare the uniform superposition of all $n$ qubits such that $q_n=q_1\oplus q_2\oplus\cdots\oplus q_{n-1}$, one would initially perform $n-1$ Hadamard gates on the first $n-1$ qubits, then separately have these perform a controlled-$X$ (controlled-NOT) on the $n$th qubit.

As to the other question about preparing uniform superpositions for other interesting states or interesting subsets of the $2^n$ computational basis elements, there are likely too many such circuits to be formally provided, even for small $n$! There are $2^{2^n}$ different boolean functions on $n$ bits.

One approach you could always do is to prepare the uniform distribution over all $n$ qubits, calculate your function or equation of interest into an ancilla qubit, and measure the ancilla and post-select on getting the state of interest (e.g. to $|0\rangle$ or $|1\rangle$). The probability of successfully post-selecting depends on the properties of your function (e.g. how likely it is to be $|0\rangle$ or $|1\rangle$).

This would work for the "XOR state" in the original question - a fourth ancilla could store the result of the boolean test of whether $q_3=q_1\oplus q_2$, and measuring the ancilla and post-selecting upon getting $|1\rangle$ in the ancilla gives you the desired state on the other three qubits. You would get $|1\rangle$ 50% of the time. But, such a folk approach probably isn't written down anywhere formally.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Awesome, thank you! $\endgroup$
    – smuecke
    May 14 at 12:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.