$\newcommand{\bra}[1]{\langle#1\rvert} % Bra \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\lvert#1\rangle} % Ket \newcommand{\qprod}[2]{ \langle #1 | #2 \rangle} %Inner Product \newcommand{\braopket}[3]{\langle #1 | #2 | #3\rangle} % Matrix Element \newcommand{\expect}[1]{ \langle #1 \rangle} % Expectation value$ I am working through the book Quantum Computing: A Gentle Introduction and I was working on problem 3.2. There are no solutions in the back of the book, so I wanted to double-check this one because I was unsure if I was correct or not. (I probably could do this for all of these questions, but I don't want to spam the board) The problem is:
Show by example that a linear combination of entangled states is not necessarily entangled.
I read this and thought that the only way a linear combination of entangled states would be not entangled is if they could be measured from a different basis. My thought was to find a linear combination of Bell states where the outcome is of the form $\ket{v} = a\ket{00} + 0\ket{11}$ which would be the standard basis state $\ket{00}$. That equation looks like this:
$\ket{\phi^+} + \ket{\phi^-} = \frac{2}{\sqrt{2}}\ket{00} + 0\ket{11}$
Is my thought process correct? If it's not, can you explain why it's wrong and what a correct answer to this question would look like?