7
$\begingroup$

For pure states, it is known that one can always find a unitary that relates the two i.e. for any choice of states $\vert\psi\rangle$ and $\vert\phi\rangle$, there exists a unitary $U$ such that $U\vert\psi\rangle = \vert\phi\rangle$. Hence, we have that

$$\max_U F(\vert\phi\rangle,U\vert\psi\rangle) = 1.$$

What about mixed states? Given an arbitrary pair of states $\rho,\sigma$ such that $F(\rho,\sigma) \leq \varepsilon$ for some $\varepsilon$ much smaller than $\frac{1}{d}$ where $d$ is the dimension of the Hilbert space, can we achieve a lower bound on the following?

$$\max_U F(\rho,U\sigma U^\dagger) \geq \ ?$$

$\endgroup$
5
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I assume you use $U$ to give $U\sigma U^\dagger$ the same eigenbasis as $\rho$, matching up the ordering of the eigenvalues (largest to largest, smallest to smallest, etc). $\endgroup$
    – DaftWullie
    Sep 21, 2021 at 10:00
  • $\begingroup$ @DaftWullie thanks, that's an interesting point, thanks! I have edited slightly to remove the arbitrary $\rho$ and $\sigma$ condition since I realized my question has a trivial answer when $\sigma$ is the identity and the unitaries are not helpful. $\endgroup$
    – JRT
    Sep 21, 2021 at 10:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The condition $F(\rho,\sigma)\leq \epsilon$ does not seem meaningful because one can start with orthogonal pure states $F(\psi,\phi)=0$ and end up with identical states $F(U\psi,\phi)=F(\phi,\phi)=1$. $\endgroup$ Sep 21, 2021 at 14:37
  • $\begingroup$ @QuantumMechanic thanks! Have edited to make it clearer but I want a lower bound on the maximum possible fidelity. The max possible fidelity is 1 for pure states as you point out regardless of $\varepsilon$ but for mixed states, the condition helps. If not, one can consider the case where $\rho$ is pure and $\sigma$ is maximally mixed. We then obtain the max possible fidelity to be $\frac{1}{d}$. $\endgroup$
    – JRT
    Sep 21, 2021 at 17:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JRT got it. Now I'm interested in how $\max_U F(\rho, U\rho U^\dagger)-\min_U F(\rho, U\rho U^\dagger)$ behaves, because otherwise $\epsilon$ may reflect some luck in your original choice of location along the unitary orbit of $\sigma$ $\endgroup$ Sep 21, 2021 at 18:54

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.