2
$\begingroup$

Reading the paper Gate fidelity fluctuations and quantum process invariants I came across the concept of higher moments of the gate fidelity, for example in the following excerpt from the introduction:

In this paper, we calculate the variance of the gate fidelity analytically and discuss how it might be measured in experiments (as well as challenges to doing so!). Moreover, we develop a general method for calculating higher moments of the gate fidelity, which can be applied to other purposes.

However, I couldn't find this concept defined anywhere. From some questions on this site, I found out that Cirq uses the concept of moments to define its circuits which are collections of operations that act during the same "abstract time slice". Do moments of the gate fidelity have something to do with this notion of moments? If not, then what are the moments of gate fidelity mentioned in the paper?

Note that in section IV of the same this concept is discussed using what is derived in the earlier parts of the paper. However, I'm looking for a more conceptual definition of higher order moments before going into the mathematical details of them and the paper in general.

Any kind of reference that talks about this concept also helps.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I did not read the article, however, since they talk about variance and then higher moments, probably higher moments are skewness and kurtosis etc. $\endgroup$
    – Martin Vesely
    Sep 8, 2021 at 4:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ related on physics: physics.stackexchange.com/q/409115/58382 $\endgroup$
    – glS ♦
    Sep 8, 2021 at 8:24

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1
$\begingroup$

From a brief skim of the paper, the variance (second moment) is defined at the start of section 3, and worked with extensively throughout that section. Higher moments are defined at the start of section 4.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, just to clarify, based off this post in MSE, the moment would be $\overline{\mathcal{F}^2}$ and the variance would be the central moment, right? $\endgroup$
    – epelaez
    Sep 8, 2021 at 9:38
  • $\begingroup$ And to add on for future people. As @Martin Vesely mentioned in his moment, this concept has to do with skewness, kurtosis, etc. The third central moment measures skewness, the fourth kurtosis, etc. The $m$-th central moment if $\overline{(\mathcal{F}-\overline{F})^m}$ $\endgroup$
    – epelaez
    Sep 8, 2021 at 9:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.