2
$\begingroup$

I am working on coming up with practice problems for a QC course. I have a problem that considers two qubits as so:

$$|\psi_a\rangle = \alpha_a |0\rangle + \beta_a |1\rangle$$

$$|\psi_b\rangle = \alpha_b |0\rangle + \beta_b |1\rangle$$

But I found the alphas and betas combined with a's and b's very confusing. I was just wondering if there was a standard notation for this type of thing or any notation others have found easier to understand.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The metacharacters \langle and \rangle give you the left and right angle brackets. $\endgroup$
    – jecado
    Aug 20 at 0:05
  • $\begingroup$ $|\psi_a\rangle=a_0|0\rangle + a_1|1\rangle$ and $|\psi_b\rangle=b_0|0\rangle + b_1|1\rangle$? $\endgroup$
    – Mauricio
    Aug 20 at 13:13
3
$\begingroup$

I am not sure if this helps in any way but you could consider the state of an arbitrary qubit $i$ as:

$$ |\psi_i \rangle = \alpha_i |0\rangle + \beta_i |1\rangle $$

So if $|\psi_1 \rangle$ and $|\psi_2 \rangle$ correspond to the state of qubit $q_1$ and $q_2$ then we have $$ |\psi_1 \rangle = \alpha_1 |0\rangle + \beta_1 |1\rangle $$ $$ |\psi_2 \rangle = \alpha_2 |0\rangle + \beta_2 |1\rangle $$

This avoids mixing $\alpha$, $\beta$ with $a$ and $b$. Again, these are just dummy variables so you can change them to whatever you want.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yep, this is what I would do. Sometimes I go even further and use just a single symbol $c$ for all coefficients, with an extra subscript giving the basis state. For example: $|\psi_1\rangle=c_{01}|0\rangle+c_{11}|1\rangle$. But this has a high risk of getting confused with multi-qubit basis states, so the answer above is probably best for a course. $\endgroup$
    – jecado
    Aug 20 at 0:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.