2
$\begingroup$

Suppose I have two states $\rho_{AB}$ and $\sigma_{AB}$ such that the marginals $\rho_A = \sigma_A$. What is the most general operation that could have acted on $\rho$ to output $\sigma$?

For example, if there was no reduced state constraint, I think one can always find a unitary $U_{ABC}$ where $C$ is a purifying system such that $U_{ABC}\vert\rho_{ABC}\rangle = \vert\sigma_{ABC}\rangle$.

Now enforcing $\rho_A=\sigma_A$, is it true that there exists some unitary $U_{BC}$ that achieves $(I_A\otimes U_{BC})\vert\rho_{ABC}\rangle = \vert\sigma_{ABC}\rangle$? Or some other way to achieve such a transformation?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There are some fringe cases here that I can think of quickly. For example, for a fixed $\rho_A$, if we have that its support is entirely contained within an eigenspace of a unitary operator $U_A$ with eigenvalue $1$ then $U_A$ will have a trivial action on it. For example $\sigma_z |0\rangle = |0\rangle$ but $\sigma_z \neq I$. $\endgroup$
    – Rammus
    Mar 10 at 9:21
  • $\begingroup$ @Rammus good point. So I guess the question is whether I can still achieve the transformation using $I_A$ or if there are cases where the transformation requires me to use a unitary $U_A$ with the properties you've pointed out. $\endgroup$
    – JRT
    Mar 10 at 9:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ are you asking for the class of maps (or channels?) $\Phi$ such that $\mathrm{Tr}_2[\Phi(\rho)]=\mathrm{Tr}_2[\Phi(\sigma)]$ for all $\rho,\sigma$, or only the class of maps (channels) preserving the marginals of two specific states? $\endgroup$
    – glS
    Mar 10 at 11:37
  • $\begingroup$ @gIS I'm asking if for any $\rho, \sigma$ such that $\rho_A = \sigma_A$, can we restrict the map $\Phi: \mathcal{H}_{ABC}\rightarrow\mathcal{H}_{ABC}$ that achieves $\Phi(\rho) = \sigma$ to a form like $I_A\otimes U_{BC}$? $\endgroup$
    – JRT
    Mar 11 at 3:18
3
$\begingroup$

In the absence of the constraint on the marginal, it is true that there exists $U_{ABC}$ such that $U_{ABC}|\rho_{ABC}\rangle = |\sigma_{ABC}\rangle$. Indeed, extend $|\rho_{ABC}\rangle = |\rho_{ABC}^{(1)}\rangle$ to an orthonormal basis $|\rho_{ABC}^{(k)}\rangle$ and $|\sigma_{ABC}\rangle = |\sigma_{ABC}^{(1)}\rangle$ to an orthonormal basis $|\sigma_{ABC}^{(k)}\rangle$ and define $U_{ABC} =\sum_k |\sigma_{ABC}^{(k)}\rangle\langle\rho_{ABC}^{(k)}|$. This construction makes it clear that $U_{ABC}$ is not unique.


Now, enforcing the constraint on the marginal, it is true that for any $\rho_{AB}$ and $\sigma_{AB}$ with $\mathrm{tr}_B(\rho_{AB}) = \mathrm{tr}_B(\sigma_{AB})$ there exists $U_{BC}$ that achieves $(I_A\otimes U_{BC})|\rho_{ABC}\rangle = |\sigma_{ABC}\rangle$ where $|\rho_{ABC}\rangle$ and $|\sigma_{ABC}\rangle$ denote the respective purifications.

To see this, consider the Schmidt decompositions of the two pure states relative to the partitioning of $ABC$ into $A$ and $BC$

$$ |\rho_{ABC}\rangle = \sum_i \lambda_i |i_A\rangle|i_{BC}\rangle \\ |\sigma_{ABC}\rangle = \sum_i \mu_i |i_A'\rangle|i_{BC}'\rangle $$

where $|i_A\rangle$, $|i_A'\rangle$, $|i_{BC}\rangle$ and $|i_{BC}'\rangle$ are orthonormal sets of states (not necessarily full bases) and $\lambda_i$ and $\mu_i$ are positive real numbers. Note that

$$ \mathrm{tr}_B(\rho_{AB}) = \mathrm{tr}_{BC}(|\rho_{ABC}\rangle\langle\rho_{ABC}|) = \sum_i\lambda_i^2|i_A\rangle\langle i_A| \\ \mathrm{tr}_B(\sigma_{AB}) = \mathrm{tr}_{BC}(|\sigma_{ABC}\rangle\langle\sigma_{ABC}|) = \sum_i\mu_i^2|i_A'\rangle\langle i_A'| $$

and hence $\lambda_i = \mu_i$. Moreover, if $\lambda_i$ are distinct then the eigendecomposition above is unique and hence $|i_A\rangle = |i_A'\rangle$. If they are not, this is not guaranteed, but we can choose $|i_A\rangle = |i_A'\rangle$. In any case, we can write

$$ |\rho_{ABC}\rangle = \sum_i \lambda_i |i_A\rangle|i_{BC}\rangle \\ |\sigma_{ABC}\rangle = \sum_i \lambda_i |i_A\rangle|i_{BC}'\rangle. $$

Finally, set $U_{BC} = \sum_i |i_{BC}'\rangle\langle i_{BC}|$ and observe that

$$ (I_A\otimes U_{BC})|\rho_{ABC}\rangle = \sum_i \lambda_i |i_A\rangle U_{BC}|i_{BC}\rangle = \sum_i \lambda_i |i_A\rangle|i_{BC}'\rangle = |\sigma_{ABC}\rangle $$

as desired.


I don't know what the most general form of a marginal-preserving unitary is. It is certainly more general than $I\otimes U_{BC}$ or even $U_A\otimes U_{BC}$, because there are examples of entangling unitaries that satisfy the constraint. For example, let $A$ and $B$ denote two qubits and $\rho_{AB} = |00\rangle\langle 00|$ and $\sigma_{AB} = |01\rangle\langle 01|$. Then $\mathrm{tr}_B\rho_{AB} = \mathrm{tr}_B\sigma_{AB} = |0\rangle\langle 0|$, but $\text{CNOT}\,\rho_{AB}\,\text{CNOT}^\dagger = \sigma_{AB}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.