3
$\begingroup$

I want to be able to create the circuit depicted below, but running the code below results in an empty circuit when viewing the job afterwards.

enter image description here

backend = provider.backends.ibmq_armonk


qreg_q = QuantumRegister(1, 'q')
creg_c = ClassicalRegister(1, 'c')
circuit = QuantumCircuit(qreg_q, creg_c)

circuit.u(pi/2, pi/2, pi/2, qreg_q[0])
circuit.x(qreg_q[0])
circuit.y(qreg_q[0])
circuit.x(qreg_q[0])
circuit.y(qreg_q[0])
circuit.u(pi/2, pi/2, pi/2, qreg_q[0]).inverse()

circuit.measure(qreg_q[0], creg_c[0])


qobj = assemble(transpile(circuit, backend=backend), backend=backend)
job = backend.run(qobj)
retrieved_job = backend.retrieve_job(job.job_id())
$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Indeed, your circuit can be reduced to an identity circuit as @KAJ226 nicely explains here. The transpilation process notices that and reduces your gates to idle during circuit depth optimization:

qreg_q = QuantumRegister(1, 'q')
creg_c = ClassicalRegister(1, 'c')

circuit = QuantumCircuit(qreg_q, creg_c)
circuit.u(pi/2, pi/2, pi/2, qreg_q[0])
circuit.x(qreg_q[0])
circuit.y(qreg_q[0])
circuit.x(qreg_q[0])
circuit.y(qreg_q[0])
circuit.u(pi/2, pi/2, pi/2, qreg_q[0]).inverse()

circuit.measure(qreg_q[0], creg_c[0])

transpile(circuit, backend=backend).draw('mpl')

enter image description here

You can avoid the optimization by reducing the optimization level to $0$:

transpile(circuit, backend=backend, optimization_level=0).draw('mpl')

enter image description here

In your example, you need to modify the transpile call like this:

qobj = assemble(transpile(circuit, backend=backend, optimization_level=0), backend=backend)
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, that worked! $\endgroup$ Dec 8, 2020 at 11:12
3
$\begingroup$

Just want to add a small additional detail here that might be useful for future encounter.

The reason why you see the circuit with only measurement after the transpilation process is because $(XY)^\dagger = Y^\dagger X^\dagger = -XY$. Since

$$ XY = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1\\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} 0 & -i\\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} -i & 0\\ 0 & i \end{pmatrix}$$ and $$ (XY)^\dagger = Y^\dagger X^\dagger = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -i\\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1\\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} i & 0\\ 0 & -i \end{pmatrix}$$

Now note that $(XY)(XY)^\dagger =I $ because of definition of Unitary, and so $ XYXY = -XY(XY)^\dagger = -I $ but in quantum computing, global phase doesn't matter, so $-I = I$... since there is no experiment you can do to distinguish $|0\rangle$ from $-|0\rangle$.

Now, looking at your circuit, we have: $$UXYXYU^\dagger = UXY[-(XY)^\dagger] U^\dagger = -[UXY(XY)^\dagger U^\dagger] = -[U I U^\dagger] = -[UU^\dagger] = -I \equiv I $$
During the transpilation step, it recognizes this and made the reduction to save the possible number of quantum operations needed...hence the reason why your circuit only consists of the measurement procedure.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.