Quantum Computing Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for engineers, scientists, programmers, and computing professionals interested in quantum computing. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
I read an interesting paper of QEC with only two extra qubits.
In the paper, there is a circuit. Note that 
.
Here are some contexts of the paper:
"The stablizer is $XZZXI$. If the second gate fails and introduces an $IZ$ fault, then this fault will propagate through the subsequent gates to become an $IIZXI$ error on the data."
Since the stablizer on the second gate is $Z$, how could it introduce the $IZ$ fault? $IZ$ is equal to $Z$, isn't it? Why the subsequent gate becomes $IIZXI$?
As you can see in th picture, the (I,Z) error occurs on 2 qubits going into a CNOT. I happens on the control and Z error happens on the target ancilla qubit, and then propagates upwards through the next CNOT, then continues from the ancilla to the following CNOT and becomes an X error on the 4th data qubit because of the Hadamard gate, and finally the 5 data qubits have an error pattern (I on the first qubit, I for the second qubit, Z on the third one, X for the fourth one, and I on the 5th one).
