In this paper on quantum Ising model dynamics, they consider the Hamiltonian $$\mathcal{H} = \sum_{j < k} J_{jk} \hat{\sigma}_{j}^{z}\hat{\sigma}_{k}^{z}$$ and the correlation function $$\mathcal{G} = \langle \mathcal{T}_C(\hat{\sigma}^{a_n}_{j_n}(t_n^*)\cdot\cdot\cdot \hat{\sigma}^{a_1}_{j_1}(t_1^*)\hat{\sigma}^{b_m}_{k_m}(t_m) \cdot\cdot\cdot \hat{\sigma}^{b_1}_{k_1}(t_1)) \rangle$$ where $a,b= \pm$ and the time dependence of the Heisenberg picture $$\hat{\sigma}_{j}^{a}(t) = e^{it\mathcal{H}}\hat{\sigma}_{j}^{a}e^{-it\mathcal{H}}$$ where the time ordering operator $\mathcal{T_C}$ orders operators along a closed path $\mathcal{C}$.

Question: Can anyone see the reasoning behind the subsequent statement on page 6:

If an operator $\hat{\sigma}^{a=\pm}_{j}$ occurs in $\mathcal{G}$ one or more times, the operator $\hat{\sigma}^{z}_{j}$ (appearing in the time evolution operator) is forced to take on a well defined value $\sigma_{j}^{z}(t)$ at all points in time.

I understand why it would be well-defined for all times after $t_1$ (denoting the first occurrence of the operator $\hat{\sigma}^{a=\pm}_{j}$) since this results in the state on site $j$ being an eigenstate of $\hat{\sigma}_{j}^{z}$, hence it commutes with the Ising Hamiltonian above. But surely before $t_1$ the state on site $j$ could be in any spin orientation and hence would be affected by the Ising interaction?

Thanks for any assistance.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.