0
$\begingroup$

For example, some introductory resource I was reading years ago (forget which one) brought up such an attempt: imagine if a qbit wasn't a complex state vector which collapses probabilistically on measurement, but rather functioned as a tiny "coin" as follows (forgive the crude drawing):

Coin in a unit circle

As far as I can recall, whenever the qbit goes through a quantum gate the coin is rotated some amount, then when "measuring" the qbit you basically just look from the perspective of the basis you're measuring (say the |0>/|1> basis) and the result you see is whichever side of the coin is facing that basis (in the diagram, heads). Honestly I think I got half the details wrong on this, but it was something like that.

This was entertaining to learn about, so does anyone know of a good collection of such half-baked (or full-baked) attempts at de-probability-izing quantum mechanics? Bonus if it actually includes this coin example.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How does your coin example capture qubit states? Unitary operators on a qubit form the group $SU(2)$, which can be mapped to $SO(3)$ (or 3D rotations; module the double cover) but not $SO(2)$ (2D rotations). So your coin interpretation just wouldn't work since it's only restricted to a circle (unless you restrict yourself to only use rotations along a fixed axis). Maybe you can clarify the example a bit more explicitly? $\endgroup$ – keisuke.akira Jul 8 at 20:22
  • $\begingroup$ The example is half-remembered, I will try to find it. Anyway the question is about resources documenting attempts similar to this $\endgroup$ – ahelwer Jul 8 at 21:06
1
$\begingroup$

Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen's (local) Hidden Variable theory is the most famous deterministic attempt to explain Quantum Mechanics. You can take a look at the wiki on the explanation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidden-variable_theory. As proved later on by Bell, this theory was not "possible" given the theory could not account for experimental behavior when observing correlations between entangled states.

Within the wiki there's a second hidden-variable theory which is supposed to mathematically describe Quantum Phenomena in a deterministic way (Bohm-Debroglie Theory), but it is not considered a possible theory given the necessary assumptions to be made for it to work (multidimensional physical space, among others)

You could start from there :)

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The coin example is incorrect (that is, different from QM) if you consider correlations of measurements of entangled qubits in different bases.

If you want a more advanced attempt of building a deterministic theory underlying QM, have a look at Gerard 't Hooft book The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics which is free now.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.