0
$\begingroup$

Recently I was learning about QFT(Quantum Fourier Transform). I was learning how QFT is applied with H and cROT gates. I was playing with QFT here. I was testing with 3-Qubit set as you can see in the link. The expression used for calculating is
QFT for 3- qubit Note:-$[0.x_1x_2x_3...x_n] = \sum_{i=1} ^n x_i2^{-i} $. I got the above expression from here
As you can see from the link given above I was doing QFT on |100>, which should yield a phase of $0$ or $2\pi$ (first qubit)(calculated from the above expression) but from the simulator it is showing phase f $\pi/4$. I also did the same simulation on Qiskit, i got the same Bloch representation, the same phase for the first Qubit $\pi/4$. Now my question is why the difference? Why the difference between calculated phase and the Bloch representation in the simulators? Please help!!

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I think this is an issue of endianness of input. The Wikipedia article follows Nielsen & Chuang convention which assumes that both input and output are in big endian: the top wire has the most significant bit of the number. You can see the manually implemented circuit and the corresponding amplitudes - the phase is non-zero only on the 3rd qubit, $|0\rangle + e^{2\pi i [0.100]}|1\rangle$.

The library implementation in Quirk uses little-endian notation, so it's processing an input $|001\rangle$, and the phases of all three qubits are non-zero.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, i found out about the convention few minutes back. I was testing with |001> and |100> and found it. $\endgroup$ – Uzumaki Saptarshi May 25 at 19:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.