0
$\begingroup$

I have some problem in understanding the proof of the concavity of root fidelity given in Chapter 9.2 of Mark M. Wilde's "Quantum Information Theory". Here, the fidelity is defined by $F(\rho, \sigma) = ||\sqrt{\rho}\sqrt{\sigma}||_1^2$ where $||\cdot ||_1$ is a Schatten 1-norm and $\rho$ and $\sigma$ are density matrices. The joint concavity of root fidelity is the following property:

\begin{equation*} \sqrt{F}\left( \sum_x p_X(x)\rho_x,\, \sum_x p_X(x)\sigma_x \right) \geq \sum_x p_X(x) \sqrt{F}(\rho_x, \sigma_x) \end{equation*} where $p_X(x)$ is a probability distribution. The proof of the joint concavity is given as below in the book:

Proof. Let $|\phi^{\rho_x}\rangle_{RA}$ and $|\phi^{\sigma_x}\rangle_{RA}$ be the respective Uhlmann purifications of $\rho_x$ and $\sigma_x$, i.e, $F(\rho_x, \sigma_x) = |\langle \phi^{\rho_x}| \phi^{\sigma_x}\rangle_{RA}|^2$ where $R$ denotes the environment system.

Let $|x\rangle$ be the orthonormal basis of the system $X$. Then \begin{gather*} |\phi^{\rho}\rangle = \sum_x \sqrt{p_X(x)}|\phi^{\rho_x}\rangle_{RA} |x\rangle_X, & |\phi^{\sigma}\rangle = \sum_x \sqrt{p_X(x)}|\phi^{\sigma_x}\rangle_{RA} |x\rangle_X \end{gather*} are respective purifications of $\sum_x p_X(x)\rho_x$ and $\sum_x p_X(x)\sigma_x$. Then \begin{align*} \sqrt{F}\left( \sum_x p_X(x)\rho_x,\, \sum_x p_X(x)\sigma_x \right) & \geq |\langle\phi^{\rho}|\phi^{\sigma}\rangle| \\ & = \Bigg| \sum_x p_X(x) \langle\phi^{\rho_x}|\phi^{\sigma_x}\rangle \Bigg| \\ & \geq \sum_x p_X(x) \,|\langle\phi^{\rho_x}|\phi^{\sigma_x}\rangle|\\ & = \sum_x p_X(x) \sqrt{F}(\rho_x, \sigma_x) \end{align*} where the first inequality is due to Uhlmann's theorem.

I don't think that the second inequality holds in this proof. Which point am I missing? Is this proof correct? If not, how can I prove the joint concavity of root fidelity? I appreciate any help.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Note that the second inequality is an equality if $\langle\phi^{\rho_x}|\phi^{\sigma_x}\rangle \geq 0$ for all $x$. But we can enforce this by replacing $|\phi^{\sigma_x} \rangle$ with $|\hat{\phi}^{\sigma_x} \rangle = - |\phi^{\sigma_x} \rangle$ whenever it fails to be positive. This gives another purification that achieves the fidelity. So we can assume wlog that $|\langle\phi^{\rho_x}|\phi^{\sigma_x}\rangle| = \langle\phi^{\rho_x}|\phi^{\sigma_x}\rangle$ and the inequality holds with equality (which is all you need). $\endgroup$ – Rammus May 12 at 10:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Rammus Thank you for detailed answer! $\endgroup$ – asdf May 12 at 14:06
1
$\begingroup$

You can assign an arbitrary phase to the purifications. This way, you can make $\langle \phi^{\rho_x}\vert\phi^{\sigma_x}\rangle\ge0$, and thus you have equality in the 2nd inequality.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I got it. Thank you! $\endgroup$ – asdf May 12 at 14:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.