A team of researchers has realized hybrid quantum algorithm for solving a linear system of equations with exponential speedup that utilizes quantum phase estimation, the algorithm demonstrates quantum supremacy and holds high promise to meet practically relevant challenges.



There is also a variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithm for solving linear systems, with the aim of reducing the circuit depth and doing much of the computation classically, called VQLS.



How can we compare both algorithms?

In the part of the near-term application of H-HHL paper, they talk about Bayesian deep learning application: "One of the promising applications related to deep neural network training was discussed in [1]: since the extension of the Bayesian approach to deep architectures is a serious challenge, one can exploit the hybrid quantum HHL algorithm developed for Gaussian processes in order to calculate a model’s predictor" [21].

Which algorithm should be better in the next-gen state-of-art 53-Qubits quantum computer for the Quantum Bayesian deep learning algorithm?

  • $\begingroup$ I am particularly interested in the comparison of the H-HHL algo with that of the VQLS. I myself am interested in solving large linear systems on NISQ hardware and would like to know which of these I should experiment with. $\endgroup$ – thespaceman Jan 19 at 22:40

By a large margin, I would recommend VQLS rather than H-HHL. VQLS is significantly more well-tested, is a more significant leap from the previous state-of-the-art for hybrid quantum/classical linear solvers, and is far more in the "mainstream" realm of quantum computing, meaning that your study will be more relevant in today's quantum computing research climate if you implement VQLS instead of H-HHL.

You could also try both and compare the two!


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.