4
$\begingroup$

A qubit $\vert \psi \rangle = \alpha \vert 0 \rangle + \beta \vert 1 \rangle \in \mathcal{H}^2$. A more general form of $n$-qubits is an element in $$\mathcal{H}^{\otimes 2^{n}} = \underbrace{\mathcal{H}^2\otimes\mathcal{H}^2\otimes\ldots\otimes\mathcal{H}^2}_{n \text{ times}}.$$ Is it possible to have a qubit to be in $\mathcal{H}^{\otimes 2^{n}+1}$ i.e. in an odd dimension?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think you mean $\mathbb{C}$ instead of $\mathcal{H}$. $\endgroup$ – tparker Apr 23 at 11:37
  • $\begingroup$ I always thought they lived in $\mathcal{H}$, why do you reckon $\mathbb{C}$ instead? $\endgroup$ – M. Al Jumaily Apr 23 at 11:54
  • $\begingroup$ $\mathcal{H}$ denotes the Hilbert space of a physical system, $\mathbb{C}$ denotes the field of values that the components take on (in this case the complex numbers). So for a qubit, $\mathcal{H} = \mathbb{C}^2$. $\endgroup$ – tparker Apr 23 at 14:14
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, so you are saying that I don't have $\mathcal{H}^2$ and replace it with either $\mathbb{C}^2$ or $\mathcal{H}$? $\endgroup$ – M. Al Jumaily Apr 25 at 6:25
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, although since the point of your question is whether you can have odd-dimensional composite systems, I think that in this case $\mathbb{C}^2$ would make more sense. $\endgroup$ – tparker Apr 26 at 15:09
7
$\begingroup$

Sure. This is actually what physicists do when they make a qubit - often they don't have a system of just two levels but many levels. It's just that they choose to only use some of those levels. The simplest case, for example, is the atomic $\Lambda$ system. This has 3 levels. The two lowest energy levels are used as the qubit basis. There's a third level which isn't part of the qubit, but is made use of for making the gates.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Excellent comment! Can you please give us some information about the math used in odd dimensions? $\endgroup$ – M. Al Jumaily Apr 26 at 7:14
  • $\begingroup$ There's nothing special about odd dimensions specifically. Generally, you're looking for a Hamiltonian/unitary that has a block-diagonal structure, $H=H_1\oplus H_2$, where $H_1$ is acting just on the two-dimensional space that you want to use as a qubit, and $H_2$ acts on everything else. $\endgroup$ – DaftWullie Apr 27 at 8:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.