For the way round that you've got your inequalities, I don't think there's much that can be said. To see why, let's consider the first expression
$$
\|U-V\|_1=\text{Tr}(\sqrt{2I-VU^\dagger-UV^\dagger}).
$$
Now, $VU^\dagger$ is a unitary, and hence as a spectral decomposition. Let the eigenvectors be $|\lambda_i\rangle$ with eigenvalues $e^{i\lambda_i}$. $UV^\dagger$ has the same eigenvectors, with eigenvalues $e^{-i\lambda_i}$. Hence, the expression simplifies to
$$
\|U-V\|_1=2\sum_i\left|\sin\frac{\lambda_i}{2}\right|\geq\delta.
$$
Note that this doesn't tell us anything about an individual $\lambda_i$ (whereas if the inequality were the other way around, we'd know that $\sin\frac{\lambda_i}{2}\leq\delta$ for all $i$). In particular, there could be an $i$ such that $\lambda_i=0$. Let's call this particular vector $|\Lambda\rangle$.
Next, consider the final calculation you want
$$
\|U\rho U^\dagger-V\rho V^\dagger \|=\|\rho-U^\dagger V\rho V^\dagger U\|.
$$
It should now be clear that if $\rho=|\Lambda\rangle\langle\Lambda |$, this value is 0. Actually, it is for any eigenvector, or mixture of eigenvectors, of $VU^\dagger$. Since 0 is always the minimum value, there's clearly no non-trivial lower bound.
Having started to think about the follow-up comment, there's an even stronger example of why you can't get anything useful. Let $V=e^{i\theta} U$. Obviously, $\|U\rho U^\dagger-V\rho V^\dagger \|=0$, while $\|U-V\|_1=2N\left|\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\right|$ for $N\times N$ matrices.