3
$\begingroup$

Recently I read thread on topological quantum computers. If I understood correctly, gates in such computers are based on "effects" in two dimensional spaces. Since our space is three dimensional, such topology has to be "simulated".

My questions are:

  1. Can 2D materials (like graphene) be used for construction of topological quantum computer (i.e. to produce anyons used for computing)?
  2. Could you please provide with link to articles on physical implementation of topological quantum computer?

Cross-posted on Physics SE

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Microsoft has invested huge resources into engineering topological qubits. Their approach is based on topological Majorana states, which occur at the edges of a topological superconducting chain or at interfaces between such chains. For those who see these words for the first time, a quick mental representation is supplied by a ribbon, which can be twisted a number of times, either clockwise or counter-clockwise. As long as the ends of the ribbon are held fixed, the information stored in the those windings remains safe against external factors. Unfortunately, this is a classical picture that needs to be lifted to the quantum realm. Nevertheless, these ribbons are 1-dimensional and anyons usually occur in 2-dimensions. The trick is to use a network of ribbons, which can be connected and disconnected such that the windings can be passed from one ribbon to another. In fact, there is a trick called the T-junction process, which uses the coupling of three wires to reverse the order of the Majorana anyons in a wire. See

J. Alicea, Y. Oreg, G. Refael, F. v. Oppen and M. P. A. Fisher, Non-Abelian statistics and topological quantum information processing in 1D wire networks, Nature Physics 7, 412, (2011).

These exchanges of anyons supply the elementary unitary operations one uses in topological quantum computation. In any case, some news about Microsoft's efforts are highlighted here:

https://www.cnet.com/news/for-faster-quantum-computing-microsoft-builds-a-better-qubit/

The sad reality is that: ``One drawback of Microsoft's topological qubit, though, is that they're not available yet." The word is that the effort towards a topological quantum computer has reached the point of make-or-break and we will definitely hear more news soon from Microsoft.

Lastly, a comment about graphene and 2-systems. Evidence of non-abelian anyon presence is routinely observed in the dynamics of electrons trapped at the interface between semiconductor films (quantum wells) when subjected to strong magnetic fields. However, manipulating these anyons is an entirely different task. While similar evidence was observed in graphene when subjected to strong magnetic fields,

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-018-0355-x

graphene is not actively researched for the purpose of topological quantum computation.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the answer. For those interested in what are Majorana particles are and how they differ from ordinary elementary particles: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/541915/… $\endgroup$ Apr 6, 2020 at 21:40
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Emil - Do you have any resources on graphene being a viable material for developing a quantum computer (not necessarily topological)? I ask because an Australian company, Archer Materials, is developing a room temperature quantum chip using graphene. $\endgroup$ Nov 18, 2020 at 22:30
  • $\begingroup$ @user2521987: I came across this article on application of graphene in QC: osapublishing.org/optica/… $\endgroup$ Oct 3, 2021 at 16:34
  • $\begingroup$ @user2521987 you can look at the work of Joel I-Jan Wang from MIT: scholar.google.com/… for example. If you have questions about this - feel free to ask $\endgroup$
    – Lior
    Feb 23, 2022 at 6:34
4
$\begingroup$

Besides nanowires, Majoranas can also be found in the center of vortices in a chiral p-wave superconductor, for instance [1].

Moving the vortices in real space or using some measurement based realization of braiding[2] could be a 2D setup. But of course, it's easier said than done.

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1736

[2] https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.0279

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.