Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 1, 2018 at 18:01 comment added Discrete lizard @NieldeBeaudrap I think I was mainly confused as I already assumed the entanglement also needed to involve classical computation of some sort. But it seems that involving computation was not the intention.
Apr 1, 2018 at 16:48 history closed Kiro
User that hates AI
Glorfindel
Sanchayan Dutta
Discrete lizard
Not suitable for this site
Apr 1, 2018 at 16:36 comment added Sanchayan Dutta I recommend going through this video by Veritasium and this excellent answer by @joshphysics on Physics SE. However, as such your question is off-topic here, as it is purely a physics question.
Apr 1, 2018 at 16:10 review Close votes
Apr 1, 2018 at 16:48
Apr 1, 2018 at 15:51 comment added Kiro Is there any reason why this question should be here, rather than in physics? I don't see any computing here.
Apr 1, 2018 at 15:29 comment added user1039 I think it will be easy to argue endlessly about the answer: In some sense (locality, realism) there is no analogue in classical physics whilst in another sense (correlated probabilities), there is.
Apr 1, 2018 at 14:53 review Low quality posts
Apr 1, 2018 at 16:50
Apr 1, 2018 at 14:44 comment added Niel de Beaudrap @DiscreteLizard: I think, since quantum entanglement is a general property with a mathematical description, a similarly abstract answer about classical information would do.
Apr 1, 2018 at 14:36 comment added Discrete lizard This is a bit vague. What properties of quantum entanglement must be present in this classical 'object' (Algorithm? Hardware? Property of one of the previous? Something else?), for it to be the analogy you want?
Apr 1, 2018 at 14:34 history asked Chinni CC BY-SA 3.0