Timeline for What is the difference between transmon and Xmon qubits?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2019 at 18:10 | vote | accept | glS♦ | ||
| Jan 3, 2019 at 15:32 | comment | added | user129412 | Because I seem to recall that the differential Cooper pair box aimed to be immune to correlated charge noise (but the transmon doesn't really care all that much about charge noise) and to get rid of the large reservoir in which non-equilibrium QPs are generated more often than on the island (but that seemed to be in vain as the islands are still poisoned, plus transmon islands are much bigger than CPB islands in general so that also does not seem all that relevant) | |
| Jan 3, 2019 at 15:30 | comment | added | user129412 | @DanielSank Would you be able to comment on the difference between a differential transmon and one that is not? The advantages that one might have over the other? That is, ignoring the xmon aspect of not coupling to other qubits via a bus, just the difference for the qubit itself in using an island (junction) coupled to a reservoir vs two coupled islands? | |
| Sep 8, 2018 at 6:23 | comment | added | DanielSank | @glS As you can see in the edited answer, there may not really not a well-defined distinction between "xmon" and "transmon" any more, so it's hard to answer. | |
| Sep 8, 2018 at 6:21 | history | edited | DanielSank | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
more information
|
| Jul 27, 2018 at 11:16 | comment | added | glS♦ | could you say a few words about the advantages of one with respect to the other? Is it just a matter that each is more suitable for some application? | |
| Jul 24, 2018 at 18:57 | history | edited | DanielSank | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 71 characters in body
|
| Apr 1, 2018 at 4:34 | history | answered | DanielSank | CC BY-SA 3.0 |